Expression of yeast mitochondrial aconitase (Aco1) in a Bacillus subtilis aconitase null mutant restored aconitase activity and glutamate prototrophy but only partially restored sporulation. Late sporulation gene expression in the Aco1-expressing strain was delayed.Bacillus subtilis aconitase, encoded by the citB gene (6), is both an enzyme of the Krebs citric acid cycle and an RNA binding protein (1,6). The RNA binding function is similar to that of the eukaryotic cytoplasmic aconitase IRP-1 (iron regulatory protein 1) (2,4,8,9), but the physiological role of B. subtilis aconitase RNA binding is not known (1). A citB null mutant requires glutamate (Glt) for growth and is severely defective in sporulation, having a sporulation efficiency 10 6 -fold lower than that of the wild type (5). Part of the reason for this defect is intracellular and extracellular accumulation of citrate, which chelates divalent cations, reduces the pH, and prevents activation of the master transcriptional regulator of sporulation Spo0A, resulting in a blockage of sporulation at stage 0 (5). However, alleviation of these metabolic defects results in only partial restoration of sporulation (5,11,13,20), suggesting a nonenzymatic role for aconitase in sporulation, possibly through utilization of its RNA binding function.To assess the effect of the loss of aconitase RNA binding on sporulation, we sought to create a B. subtilis mutant strain that has aconitase enzyme activity but no RNA binding activity. To do so, we expressed a heterologous aconitase, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitochondrial aconitase (Aco1), which is devoid of RNA binding activity (12,16,17), in a citB null mutant strain and tested the ability of the yeast enzyme to substitute for B. subtilis aconitase during growth and sporulation.The coding sequence of Aco1 was cloned downstream of a B. subtilis promoter (Pspac*) and ribosome binding site, in plasmid pKM67 (13), and integrated into the chromosome of a citB null mutant, MAB160 [trpC2 pheA1 ⍀(citB::spc)] (5), at the nonessential amyE locus. Transformants were selected for glutamate prototrophy (Glt ϩ ) or for chloramphenicol resistance (Cam r ), a vector marker. Cam r transformants appeared during overnight incubation at 30°C, but most were Glt Ϫ . Glt ϩ transformants appeared only after 48 to 72 h at 30°C; the prolonged incubation period suggested that a mutation in the recipient cells might have been required to permit the appearance of the Glt ϩ transformants. Glt ϩ transformants grew in minimal medium at 30°C but not at 37°C. Note that laboratory strains of S. cerevisiae grow much better at 30°C than at 37°C (D. Dawson, personal communication).To investigate whether a mutation had occurred in the Glt ϩ transformants, chromosomal DNA from a Glt ϩ Cam r transformant was isolated and introduced again into MAB160. Transformants were selected either for the Glt ϩ or for the Cam r phenotype and were then tested for the unselected marker. All Glt ϩ transformants were Cam r , but only 5% of Cam r transformants were Glt ϩ . In...