1998
DOI: 10.1006/ijhc.1998.0201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A relational model of cognitive maps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous work on causal maps (see [1,5,11,19] for excellent surveys) has produced a variety of formalisms for representing and making inference on causal maps. As DANA aims to support policy analysts in modeling and comparing different actor perceptions, its causal maps should be represented in such a way that: 1. the analyst can differentiate between stronger and weaker causal influence; 2. the analyst can represent an actor's uncertainty regarding external influences and causal relations; 3. the impact of tactics and external influences on outcomes of interest can be inferred from a map, and compared across maps; 4. the analyst can differentiate between more and less important outcomes of interest; 5. an actor's preferred strategy can be inferred from a map (to detect conflicting views on what is good policy).…”
Section: A Choice Of Causal Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous work on causal maps (see [1,5,11,19] for excellent surveys) has produced a variety of formalisms for representing and making inference on causal maps. As DANA aims to support policy analysts in modeling and comparing different actor perceptions, its causal maps should be represented in such a way that: 1. the analyst can differentiate between stronger and weaker causal influence; 2. the analyst can represent an actor's uncertainty regarding external influences and causal relations; 3. the impact of tactics and external influences on outcomes of interest can be inferred from a map, and compared across maps; 4. the analyst can differentiate between more and less important outcomes of interest; 5. an actor's preferred strategy can be inferred from a map (to detect conflicting views on what is good policy).…”
Section: A Choice Of Causal Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unless some rules for truncation are defined, a change may 'run off the scale'. DANA originally (see [4]) defined algebraic laws for ⊕ and ⊗, using tables similar to those in [5]. This led to the undesirable property that the sequence Tables 1 and 2 define the conversion functions for changes and change multipliers that are used in DANA, with the aim to preserve as much as possible the intuitive interpretation of ⊗ and ⊕, as well as their associative and commutative properties, and the property that ⊗ distributes over ⊕.…”
Section: Change and Causal Links As Multipliersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These considerations brought us to develop the formal model presented in the next section. More details on this formal model can be found elsewhere [9].…”
Section: Outline Of This Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The earliest version of the Causal CM corresponds to the model proposed by Axelrod (1976), when he designed an international affairs model through the sketch of pure causal links between concepts (Peñ a & Gutiérrez, 2004a). Since them, a broad spectrum of applications has been carrying out in many fields like: Decision support (Nakamura, Iwai, & Sawaragi, 1982), Multi-Agent systems (Chaib-draa & Desharnais, 1998), virtual reality (Johns & Blake, 2001), probabilistic causality (Wellman, 1994), on line analytical process (Zhang, 2003c) and much more (Aguilar, 2005;Kitchin, 1982). Furthermore, causal CM have dealt with specific issues regarding to: Qualitative, fuzzy, uncertainty, double-side effects and rules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%