2018
DOI: 10.1002/pen.24956
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Relationship Between the Heat of Vaporization, Surface Tension, and the Solubility Parameters, Which Includes the Ratio of the Coordination Numbers, Based on Stefan's Rule

Abstract: The correct calculi of surface tension and solubility parameters are of paramount importance for many fields of chemical engineering and materials design, such as encapsulation methods (which use the mean field theory), dispersion of nanopowders, phase compatibility in chemical blends and nanocomposites, among others. The solubility parameters play a key role in these applications along with the surface tension. Until now, the relationship between solubility parameters and surface tension was only indirect, th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, this correlation is slightly better than that for surface tension values estimated using eq 1 (AAD: 3.1 mN/m). Although there are some large deviations for highly polar solvents such as glycerol, ethanol, and methanol (probably due to a lack of correction based on the coordination number of molecules at the surface layer), 22 the overall validity of eq 3 for surface tension prediction is quite good. Although this equation was optimized for the surface tension of pure liquids, we believe that it is also valid for the solid surface energy, solid−liquid interfacial tension, and solid−solid interfacial energy.…”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, this correlation is slightly better than that for surface tension values estimated using eq 1 (AAD: 3.1 mN/m). Although there are some large deviations for highly polar solvents such as glycerol, ethanol, and methanol (probably due to a lack of correction based on the coordination number of molecules at the surface layer), 22 the overall validity of eq 3 for surface tension prediction is quite good. Although this equation was optimized for the surface tension of pure liquids, we believe that it is also valid for the solid surface energy, solid−liquid interfacial tension, and solid−solid interfacial energy.…”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is difficult to expand this equation to solid and interfacial surface energies because V mol cannot be uniquely defined for polymer and/or inorganic substrates and various types of interfacial energy (solid−liquid, solid−solid, and liquid−liquid). Although the prefactors 2.28, 1, and 1 and the size correction factor [V mol ] 1/5 in eq 1 can be roughly understood to refer to the thickness of the surface layer (interaction length and/or coordination number) 22 with respect to molecular interactions, the interaction length of molecular interactions is not necessarily correlated to molecular size. Hence, we propose a simple equation (that excludes V mol ) for the generalized surface and interfacial energy (surface and interfacial tension), σ 12 , to correlate with HSPs as follows:…”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values for V m , δ (δ D , δ P , and δ H ), and experimental γ are taken from Ref. [16] and those for A obtained via the Lifshitz theory from Refs. [3,4].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several empirical relationships between the Hansen solubility parameters δ D , δ P , and δ H and the surface tension γ of non-polar and polar substances have been proposed [10,[14][15][16][17]. We use the following latest formula derived by Abbot [10]:…”
Section: Hansen Solubility Parameter and Surface Tensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rigidification of the PCL hindrances this phenomenon. n-hexadecane is highly soluble in chloroform than in ethyl acetate, and therefore, has a better compatibility [48,49]. Thus, the use of the chloroform working solution induces a higher loss in n-hexadecane during its evaporation.…”
Section: Phase Change Properties Of Electro-sprayed Mpcmmentioning
confidence: 99%