2020 IEEE 1st International Conference for Convergence in Engineering (ICCE) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/icce50343.2020.9290718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Relative Comparison of Training Algorithms in Artificial Neural Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The division for training and data testing is as follows: In the ANN training-testing procedure, 70 randomly selected respondents' data would serve as the training data and 50 respondents' data would serve as the testing data. The data was normalized into the format [0, 1], and the learning rate was set to the comparative effective value of 0.001 [ 42 , 43 ]. Two features, the optimizer and loss function, were defined before model training.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The division for training and data testing is as follows: In the ANN training-testing procedure, 70 randomly selected respondents' data would serve as the training data and 50 respondents' data would serve as the testing data. The data was normalized into the format [0, 1], and the learning rate was set to the comparative effective value of 0.001 [ 42 , 43 ]. Two features, the optimizer and loss function, were defined before model training.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%