2014
DOI: 10.1039/c4nj00699b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A releasable disulfide carbonate linker for polyethyleneimine (PEI)-based gene vectors

Abstract: In this study, a releasable disulfide carbonate linker is used to prepare disulfide-containing crosslinked polyethyleneimines (PEI-SS-CLs) for gene delivery. ESI-MS analysis shows that after being incubated with 1,4-dithio-DL-threitol (DTT), the degradable linkages in the polyethyleneimine (PEI) derivatives undergo disulfide bond cleavage followed by intramolecular cyclization and cleavage of the neighboring carbamate bond. Moreover, it is observed that thiol/polyanions trigger the release of DNA from polyplex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the most widely used systems are ChemPlanner, [141] PathFinder, ICSynth, LHASA, CAMEO, SOPHIA, and EROS. [142] Rule-based chemical expert systems can be very helpful for specific chemical questions but suffer from disadvantages that limit their use in particular for virtual materials design: 1) many predictions or proposed reaction pathways are not precise enough or at least not match the decisions human experts would make, 2) due to performance reasons, the expert systems are not designed to handle high throughput prediction, 3) the underlying rules of the expert systems have to be encoded at least in parts manually which means that any logic that was missed by human beings is lacking in the information system, and 4) most of the reliable systems are only commercially available and very expensive. More recent approaches to the prediction of reactions and retrosynthesis may solve several problems that limit the systems used so far.…”
Section: Synthetic Accessibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the most widely used systems are ChemPlanner, [141] PathFinder, ICSynth, LHASA, CAMEO, SOPHIA, and EROS. [142] Rule-based chemical expert systems can be very helpful for specific chemical questions but suffer from disadvantages that limit their use in particular for virtual materials design: 1) many predictions or proposed reaction pathways are not precise enough or at least not match the decisions human experts would make, 2) due to performance reasons, the expert systems are not designed to handle high throughput prediction, 3) the underlying rules of the expert systems have to be encoded at least in parts manually which means that any logic that was missed by human beings is lacking in the information system, and 4) most of the reliable systems are only commercially available and very expensive. More recent approaches to the prediction of reactions and retrosynthesis may solve several problems that limit the systems used so far.…”
Section: Synthetic Accessibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has repeatedly been stated that "de novo design methods cannot identify ap erfect compound for synthesis, but it can identify high-quality ideas for detailed consideration by an expert scientist." [82] This statement is certainly true for the earlier or more traditional molecule construction programs,w hich have repeatedly resulted in overly complex chemical structures.B ased on the evidence provided by the practical application of reaction-driven de novo design, we feel that some of the contemporary design tools are in fact able to generate readily synthesizable chemical matter with the desired properties.Keeping in mind the imperfections of automated chemical synthesis planning and reaction pathway design, [83] the combination of AI-driven generative molecular design models with advanced forward-and retrosynthesis algorithms offers ample opportunity for future molecular discovery.…”
Section: Are We Nearly There Yet?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Computer-aided synthesis planning has been well-reviewed over the past years. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11] According to a recent review, 11 computer-aided retrosynthetic route planning strategies can be clustered into two main categories: template-based and template-free methods. Template-based methods, including the LHASA soware, 4,12 have been applied since the philosophy of retrosynthetic analysis was put forward by E. J. Corey.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%