A reliability evaluation method for phased‐mission system considering multi‐mechanism coupling within phases

Abstract

Due to the difference of environmental stress and system configuration, as well as the coupling between phases, the phased-mission system (PMS) has significant disparity in the failure modes and mechanisms of components in different phases. From the perspective of failure mechanism, an initial independent one will affect or be affected by other failure mechanisms during a task, and eventually leads to the failure of system. Therefore, the coupling of failure mechanisms in PMS is considered in this paper, and the recursive quantitative analysis of coupling from failure mechanism level to system level and phase level are accomplished by means of the basic rules of reliability physics. Furthermore, taking a core circuit from an aircraft electronic system as an example, the reliability modeling and analysis are performed. The results show that after considering the coupling relationship between failure mechanisms within each phase, the reliability and lifetime of components are reduced compared with the mechanismindependence situation, however, the cumulative failure probability of the system is increased. It reveals that it is very important to involve the coupling relationship between failure mechanisms in the reliability analysis of PMS, which can improve the accuracy of the prediction.

A Method to Facilitate the Regeneration of Human Resources: A Sustainability Perspective

“…Due to the diversity of strengths among employees, direct comparisons can be complex and may lead to unconvincing ranking results. Additionally, variations in evaluation weight vectors among employees can cause inconsistencies in evaluation criteria [36]. Considering the limitations of using CIS directly as a weight vector in evaluations, we must develop a comprehensive, credible, and fair approach that accurately reflects an individual's overall performance-one that not only underscores an employee's relative strengths but also accounts for the disparities among various strengths.…”