2000
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-0271-1_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Remark on the Bers Type of Some Self-Maps of Riemann Surfaces with Two Specified Points

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before writing the current version of the present paper, we showed that the statement of the theorem is true for n = 2. This was announced at talks at the Fukuoka Conference in 1999 (see Imayoshi-Ito-Yamamoto [6]) and at Ichinoseki 2000; a detailed treatment of this result appears in Imayoshi-Ito-Yamamoto [7]. It should be noted that these studies distinguished topologically the four types (elliptic, parabolic, hyperbolic, pseudohyperbolic) of Bers [3], rather than just the three types (reducible, pseudo-Anosov, of finite order) of Thurston [2].…”
Section: Introduction and Summary Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Before writing the current version of the present paper, we showed that the statement of the theorem is true for n = 2. This was announced at talks at the Fukuoka Conference in 1999 (see Imayoshi-Ito-Yamamoto [6]) and at Ichinoseki 2000; a detailed treatment of this result appears in Imayoshi-Ito-Yamamoto [7]. It should be noted that these studies distinguished topologically the four types (elliptic, parabolic, hyperbolic, pseudohyperbolic) of Bers [3], rather than just the three types (reducible, pseudo-Anosov, of finite order) of Thurston [2].…”
Section: Introduction and Summary Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The second important component of the proof of Theorem 6.1 is Theorem 2.4 below. The statement and proof of Theorem 2.4 in the case of n = 2 are due to Imayoshi-Ito-Yamamoto [21] with a weaker upper bound on the quasiconformal dilatation. The proof of Imayoshi-Ito-Yamamoto holds in the case of n > 2 punctures without any modification so we will omit the full argument and will instead provide a sketch of proof, namely the construction of F t and a justification of our improved upper bound on K t = K(F t ).…”
Section: Some Quasiconformal Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we recall the main theorem of Imayoshi, Ito and Yamamoto [8]. Denote M = S × S, a = {a, a ′ }, and ∆ = {(x, y) ∈ M : x = y}.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then s 1 = F (a, t) and s 2 = F (a ′ , t), where 1 ≤ t ≤ 1, are closed curve on S, which define a pure braids [b F ] represented by b F = (s 1 , s 2 ) in the fundamental group π 1 (M − ∆, a). By Theorem 1.3 and the main theorem of [8], we obtain infinitely many essential pure braids [b F ] so that s 1 and s 2 are nontrivial and nonparallel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%