1991
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-0455-8_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Remark on the Dunkl Differential—Difference Operators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
159
0
4

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
159
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well known [13][14][15] that there exists an intertwining operator M = M (g) which establishes an isospectrality of H (g) and H (g+1) . This differential operators of order 1 2 n(n−1) has the simple form 34) and using the Weyl antisymmetry of M it is straightforward to verify that (see e.g.…”
Section: Jhep10(2015)191mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known [13][14][15] that there exists an intertwining operator M = M (g) which establishes an isospectrality of H (g) and H (g+1) . This differential operators of order 1 2 n(n−1) has the simple form 34) and using the Weyl antisymmetry of M it is straightforward to verify that (see e.g.…”
Section: Jhep10(2015)191mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6]). In the general case the proof of integrability was found later by Heckman and Opdam [7,8] who used very different arguments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and write ∆ k for the Dunkl Laplacian on R N (see [15]). This is a differentialdifference operator, which reduces to the Euclidean Laplacian ∆ when k ≡ 0.…”
Section: Hermite Semigroup and Fourier Transformmentioning
confidence: 99%