2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-015-2138-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A remote sensing aided multi-layer perceptron-Markov chain analysis for land use and land cover change prediction in Patna district (Bihar), India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
99
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 246 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
99
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The drainage channel has divided into number of segments for determination of sinuosity parameter (Miller 1953).…”
Section: Channel Index (Ci) and Valley Index (Vi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The drainage channel has divided into number of segments for determination of sinuosity parameter (Miller 1953).…”
Section: Channel Index (Ci) and Valley Index (Vi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, very important and innovative research work on the river morphometry has been completed by Horton (1932Horton ( , 1945, Miller (1953), Smith (1950), Strahler (1964) and others. These techniques have been deliberated by a number of researchers on varied geographical areas of India.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to result of MLP model process between training and test dataset was observed 76.10% accuracy rate. The production of potential change maps by taking advantage of the transformations were input data set required for MC analysis (Mishra, 2016). The number of outputs of the transformation potential maps (Figure 7) are equal to the number of major change input groupings.…”
Section: Multi-temporal Lulc Mapping and Accuracy Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 'Cellular Automata' and 'Markov Chain' models are considered to be advantageous for modeling land use changes (Mishra and Rai, 2016;Parsa et al, 2016). The issues involved when a Markov chain model lacks spatially referred output and transition probabilities may be accurate on a categorical basis, there are no specifications on spatial distribution of each land use category occurrence (Arsanjani et al, 2013).…”
Section: Ca-markov Chain Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cellular automata added into a Markov model lead to probable spatial transitions occurring in particular area over a period time (Subedi et al, 2013). In other words, the quantity of changes from the Markov Chain model then are made geo-referred and spatial through cellular automata (Mishra and Rai, 2016). The CA-Markov model uses Markov Chain analysis outputs, particularly the Transition Area file, to apply a contiguity filter to enable the development of other land use characteristics from time two into a later time period (Parsa et al, 2016).…”
Section: Ca-markov Chain Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%