1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0550-3213(96)00611-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A renormalization group for dynamical triangulations in arbitrary dimensions

Abstract: A block spin renormalization group approach is proposed for the dynamical triangulation formulation of quantum gravity in arbitrary dimensions. Renormalization group flow diagrams are presented for the three-dimensional and four-dimensional theories near their respective transitions.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…My motivation is two-fold. First, the coarse graining procedures developed by Johnston, Kownacki, and Krzywicki [30] and by Catterall, Renken, and Thorleifsson [35,36,39] for Euclidean dynamical triangulations and even the coarse graining procedure developed by Henson [27] for causal dynamical triangulations are in fact not well-suited to causal dynamical triangulations: the triangulation obtained after just a single iteration of the procedure is no longer necessarily a causal triangulation. (Indeed, the output of Henson's coarse graining procedure might not even be a simplicial manifold.)…”
Section: Construction Of the Renormalization Group Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…My motivation is two-fold. First, the coarse graining procedures developed by Johnston, Kownacki, and Krzywicki [30] and by Catterall, Renken, and Thorleifsson [35,36,39] for Euclidean dynamical triangulations and even the coarse graining procedure developed by Henson [27] for causal dynamical triangulations are in fact not well-suited to causal dynamical triangulations: the triangulation obtained after just a single iteration of the procedure is no longer necessarily a causal triangulation. (Indeed, the output of Henson's coarse graining procedure might not even be a simplicial manifold.)…”
Section: Construction Of the Renormalization Group Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This amounts to adding to the action a term of the form −µ v ln o(v)/5, where o(v) is the number of 4-simplices containing a vertex v. For µ = −5, −1, 1, 5, this seems to lead merely to a shift of the critical line. This setting has been revived recently by Renken [178,177] in the context of a renormalization group analysis.…”
Section: Influence Of the Measurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This step can only be performed once, which severely limits the power of the procedure. Renken [178,177] has applied a different blocking move, involving node deletion, and studied the RG flow using the volume and the vertex order as observables.…”
Section: Renormalization Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…larger volumes) are needed to determine which phase it is in or whether it approaches a fixed point. At a strongly first order transition, such as in three dimensions with µ = 0, it is not necessary to go to large volumes to see what the phase is, so there are no intermediate flows [8]. In four dimensions, the corresponding transition appears second order at small volumes, and there are intermediate flows similar to the one in the figure.…”
Section: Results For the Transition Linementioning
confidence: 93%
“…When combined with Monte Carlo simulation it allows a non-perturbative determination of the flows and phase structure. A formulation of the renormalization group applicable to dynamical triangulations has been developed and established in previous papers [6,4,7,8]. It is useful to recall some details of this scheme.…”
Section: Computational Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%