A report of cherry rusty mottle-associated virus in South Carolina

Poudel, Bindu; Scott, S. W.

doi:10.1007/s13314-017-0239-4

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…CCDaV, identified from Turkey, was reported in China (Guo et al, 2015;Karanfil and Korkmaz, 2019). CRMaV was identified from Canada but also reported in South Carolina (Poudel and Scott, 2017). RLBV, identified from Scotland, was reported in Montenegro, Bulgaria, Finland, and Serbia (Mavriè Pleško et al, 2014;Zindović et al, 2015;Dong et al, 2016;.…”

Section: Biology Progress After the Discovery Of New Fruit Tree Virusmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is There a “Biological Desert” With the Discovery of New Plant Viruses? A Retrospective Analysis for New Fruit Tree Viruses

Hou

Massart

2020

Front. Microbiol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

High throughput sequencing technologies accelerated the pace of discovery and identification of new viral species. Nevertheless, biological characterization of a new virus is a complex and long process, which can hardly follow the current pace of virus discovery. This review has analyzed 78 publications of new viruses and viroids discovered from 32 fruit tree species since 2011. The scientific biological information useful for a pest risk assessment and published together with the discovery of a new fruit tree virus or viroid has been analyzed. In addition, the 933 publications citing at least one of these original publications were reviewed, focusing on the biology-related information provided. In the original publications, the scientific information provided was the development of a detection test (94%), whole-genome sequence including UTRs (92%), local and large-scale epidemiological surveys (68%), infectivity and indicators experiments (50%), association with symptoms (25%), host range infection (23%), and natural vector identification (8%). The publication of a new virus is cited 2.8 times per year on average. Only 18% of the citations reported information on the biology or geographical repartition of the new viruses. These citing publications improved the new virus characterization by identifying the virus in a new country or continent, determining a new host, developing a new diagnostic test, studying genome or gene diversity, or by studying the transmission. Based on the gathered scientific information on the virus biology, the fulfillment of a recently proposed framework has been evaluated. A baseline prioritization approach for publishing a new plant virus is proposed for proper assessment of the potential risks caused by a newly identified fruit tree virus.

show abstract

Section: Biology Progress After the Discovery Of New Fruit Tree Virusmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is There a “Biological Desert” With the Discovery of New Plant Viruses? A Retrospective Analysis for New Fruit Tree Viruses

Hou

Massart

2020

Front. Microbiol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The symptomatology associated with the virus on different P. avium cultivars consists of yellow mottle on leaves, with a bronze overtone . Symptoms of leaf mottling, vein clearing and line patterns on suckers growing from a P. avium rootstock were described, whereas the P. serrulata scion was symptomless (Poudel and Yes Scott, 2017). Despite the frequent presence of multiple infectious agents in naturally infected trees, a correlation seems established between the presence of CRMaV and rusty mottle disease symptoms (Villamor et al, 2015) Cherry twisted leaf-associated virus (CTLaV)…”

Section: Yesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pest categorisation of non‐EU viruses and viroids of Prunus L.

Bragard¹,

Dehnen‐Schmutz²,

Gonthier³

et al. 2019

EFS2

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Following a request from the EU Commission, the Panel on Plant Health addressed the pest categorisation of the viruses and viroids of Prunus L. determined as being either non-EU or of undetermined standing in a previous EFSA opinion. These infectious agents belong to different genera and are heterogeneous in their biology. With the exclusion of Ilarvirus S1 and Ilarvirus S2, for which very limited information exists, the pest categorisation was completed for 26 viruses and 1 viroid having acknowledged identities and available detection methods. All these viruses are efficiently transmitted by vegetative plant propagation techniques, with plants for planting representing the major pathway for long-distance dispersal and thus considered as the major pathway for entry. Depending on the virus, additional pathway(s) can also be Prunus seeds, pollen and/or vector(s). Most of the viruses categorised here are known to infect only one or few plant genera, but some of them have a wide host range, thus extending the possible entry pathways. Apple scar skin viroid, American plum line pattern virus, cherry mottle leaf virus, cherry rasp leaf virus, cherry rosette virus, cherry rusty mottle-associated virus, cherry twisted leaf-associated virus, peach enation virus, peach mosaic virus, peach rosette mosaic virus, tobacco ringspot virus and tomato ringspot virus meet all the criteria evaluated by EFSA to qualify as potential Union quarantine pests (QPs). With the exception of impact in the EU territory, on which the Panel was unable to conclude, apricot vein clearing virus, Asian prunus virus 1, Asian prunus virus 2, Asian prunus virus 3, Caucasus prunus virus, cherry virus B, Mume virus A, nectarine stem pitting-associated virus, nectarine virus M, peach chlorotic mottle virus, peach leaf pitting-associated virus, peach virus D, prunus virus F and prunus virus T satisfy all the other criteria to be considered as potential Union QPs. Prunus geminivirus A does not meet the criterion of having negative impact in the EU. For several viruses, especially those recently discovered, the categorisation is associated with high uncertainties mainly because of the absence of data on their biology, distribution and impact. Since this opinion addresses specifically the non-EU viruses, in general these viruses do not meet the criteria assessed by EFSA to qualify as potential Union regulated non-quarantine pests.

show abstract

A report of cherry rusty mottle-associated virus in South Carolina

Cited by 2 publications

References 8 publications

Is There a “Biological Desert” With the Discovery of New Plant Viruses? A Retrospective Analysis for New Fruit Tree Viruses

Is There a “Biological Desert” With the Discovery of New Plant Viruses? A Retrospective Analysis for New Fruit Tree Viruses

Pest categorisation of non‐EU viruses and viroids of Prunus L.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About