2017
DOI: 10.1089/gtmb.2016.0251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Report on Molecular Diagnostic Testing for Inherited Retinal Dystrophies by Targeted Genetic Analyses

Abstract: Aim: To test the utility of targeted sequencing as a method of clinical molecular testing in patients diagnosed with inherited retinal degeneration (IRD). Methods: After genetic counseling, peripheral blood was drawn from 188 probands and 36 carriers of IRD. Single gene testing was performed on each patient in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment (CLIA) certified laboratory. DNA was isolated, and all exons in the gene of interest were analyzed along with 20 base pairs of flanking intronic sequence. Gene… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We chose to focus on IRDs due to the expertize and case mix of our laboratory, and thus the larger sub-cohort available for study; still proportion of unsolved cases pending on a VUS reclassification among diseases does not differ. Our diagnostic ratios (solved/unsolved) in IRDs are consistent with previous studies 36 , 37 , but differ from the non-IRD sub-cohort, illustrating both the general heterogeneity of rare diseases and the impact of expertize on diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…We chose to focus on IRDs due to the expertize and case mix of our laboratory, and thus the larger sub-cohort available for study; still proportion of unsolved cases pending on a VUS reclassification among diseases does not differ. Our diagnostic ratios (solved/unsolved) in IRDs are consistent with previous studies 36 , 37 , but differ from the non-IRD sub-cohort, illustrating both the general heterogeneity of rare diseases and the impact of expertize on diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The proportions of RPE65 -IRD in the EU-5 counties and the European region ranged between 1.2% in the UK and 14% in Germany [ 83 , 91 ]. Lastly, RPE65 mutations were estimated at ~ 1% in the US, while for the Middle East region, it varied between 4.81% in Saudi Arabia and 8% in Iran’s clinically diagnosed cases with IRD [ 81 , 85 , 87 , 89 ]. Also, based on the available data, the proportions of RPE65 in molecularly diagnosed cases with IRD was reported at 1.78% in China, 2.82% in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and 4% in Brazil [ 57 , 84 , 92 ] (Supplementary Table B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RPE65 variants have been reported to be most prevalent cause of LCA in the Nordic country of Denmark (17.44%) [ 102 ]. In North America, mutations in RPE65 were reported to cause 3.0–15.55% of clinically diagnosed LCA cases in the US, 0.81–1.85% of RP in the US, 3.28% for RPE65 -RP in Mexico and ~ 1% for clinically diagnosed IRD cases in the US [ 45 , 49 , 56 , 79 , 81 , 85 ]. In South America, the proportion were high due to the identification in the molecularly diagnosed Brazilian patients with only RPE65 -LCA at 20.51% and RPE65 -IRD at 4% [ 57 , 58 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a survey conducted by our group in Korea in May 2022, biallelic RPE65 mutations were found in 6 out of 2,140 patients (0.28%), including 109 LCA and 2,031 RP patients (unpublished data). In other countries, the proportion of RPE65-associated retinal dystrophy ranged from 0.60% to 20% [2,6,7,12,13,25,43,48,49,67,[78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93]. The results of those studies are summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Epidemiology Of Rpe65-associated Retinal Dystrophymentioning
confidence: 99%