2017
DOI: 10.1111/jre.12473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A reproducible microcosm biofilm model of subgingival microbial communities

Abstract: This biofilm model allows reproducible production of complex subgingival microbial communities.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
1
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
21
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, we could show that microcosm biofilms resembling subgingival periodontitis-associated biofilms can be cultured in a model using subgingival plaque sampled from periodontitis patients as an inoculum. This model supported the growth of fastidious anaerobic and proteolytic Gram-negative bacteria [25]. However, for practical reasons, a limited amount of subgingival plaque is available from a single patient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, we could show that microcosm biofilms resembling subgingival periodontitis-associated biofilms can be cultured in a model using subgingival plaque sampled from periodontitis patients as an inoculum. This model supported the growth of fastidious anaerobic and proteolytic Gram-negative bacteria [25]. However, for practical reasons, a limited amount of subgingival plaque is available from a single patient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Yet another option combining advantageous features from both models described above is to take intra-oral microbiological samples from patients, e.g. plaque or saliva, and use these as ex vivo inocula to grow so-called microcosm biofilms in vitro [19,[23][24][25][26][27]. These microcosm biofilms inoculated from patient samples are closer to the complex in vivo situation as compared to in vitro biofilms from defined consortia and exhibit easier handling and less dependence on participants as compared to biofilms grown in situ [19,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AAA model offers the advantage of active attachment (rather than sedimentation) of the bacteria onto the substrate, and also facilitates controlling the periods which the biofilms are exposed to the tested compounds [34]. Choice of inoculum and growth conditions are crucial aspects for microcosm biofilms [40,[42][43][44][45]. In the present study, human saliva was chosen as inoculum source because it can be collected easier and in higher quantities as compared with dental plaque [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do note that our inoculum was distinct from general descriptions of periodontitis communities. Fusobacterium is a common genus found in both health and disease communities (Colombo & Tanner, 2019) and its relative abundance can be over 30% of a periodontitis sample (Baraniya et al., 2020; Fernandez y Mostajo et al., 2017). However, just one species of Fusobacterium was present in the current inoculum, making up only 0.07% of the community.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%