2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.05.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A research agenda for bipolar disorder developed from a patients’ perspective

Abstract: The theme 'causes of disorder' is prioritized highest. We argue that this can be explained by the added value of an explanatory framework for appropriate treatment and recovery. The theme 'recovery & recovery oriented care' is currently underrepresented in actual research. It is argued that in order to bridge the knowledge and implementation gap, social science and health system research is needed in addition to biomedical research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These research needs were validated in a larger sample (n = 219) by means of a questionnaire. We have reported this study in detail elsewhere (Maassen et al 2018 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These research needs were validated in a larger sample (n = 219) by means of a questionnaire. We have reported this study in detail elsewhere (Maassen et al 2018 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expert by experience input would be beneficial to gain a perspective on what would help in the self-management of BD (Maassen, Regeer, Bunders, Regeer, & Kupka, 2018).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a discussion tool, 23 research needs according to patients with BD were used. These research needs were formulated by patients with BD in a previous study by the authors, which aimed to set a research agenda from the perspective of patients with BD (Maassen et al, 2018). First, two pilot interviews were conducted with two researcher-psychiatrists to fine-tune the interview guide.…”
Section: Phase 2: Reflections Of Researcher-clinicians On Patients' Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it improves the clinical relevance of research and the acceptance of the research outcomes (Abma & Broerse, 2010;Elberse et al, 2012), and second, it contributes substantive new knowledge, owing to patients' experience of living with the illness and their need for care (Broerse, Zweekhorst, van Rensen, & de Haan, 2010;Tait, 2005). In a previous study, we explored the research needs of patients with BD (Maassen, Regeer, Bunders, Regeer, & Kupka, 2018). As clinicians are also end users of the research, the same argument can be made to include them in the research process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation