2017
DOI: 10.17157/mat.4.2.499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A research alliance

Abstract: This article explores a research alliance across fields and continents in the wake of the early and controversial HIV-prevention clinical trials of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Our research set out to understand why three trial arms prematurely closed while another was refused approval from the relevant institutional review board. We conducted ethnographic research on 'what happened' at two of the sites. Over time our research strategy cohered around unearthing and exploring rapidly disappearing knowledge.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Global health depends on inequality for its existence (Crane 2013), and, by embracing partnership, global health programmes and professionals stake out an ethical relationship to this inequality: their intent is not exploitation of poverty for scientific or educational gain, but collaboration to improve health and reduce human suffering. In this dream, ‘real partnership’ bridges international resource inequalities (although ‘partnership’ language may in fact mask inequalities and disagreements; see Okwaro and Geissler 2015; Peterson and Folayan 2017). Frequently, ‘capacity building’ is the mechanism for this bridging and indicative of a non-exploitative partnership.…”
Section: Dreams and Realities In Global Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Global health depends on inequality for its existence (Crane 2013), and, by embracing partnership, global health programmes and professionals stake out an ethical relationship to this inequality: their intent is not exploitation of poverty for scientific or educational gain, but collaboration to improve health and reduce human suffering. In this dream, ‘real partnership’ bridges international resource inequalities (although ‘partnership’ language may in fact mask inequalities and disagreements; see Okwaro and Geissler 2015; Peterson and Folayan 2017). Frequently, ‘capacity building’ is the mechanism for this bridging and indicative of a non-exploitative partnership.…”
Section: Dreams and Realities In Global Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following these highly publicised protests, the International AIDS Society and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (Gates Foundation) held a stakeholder consultation to identify a way forward with biomedical HIV prevention research (Peterson and Folayan 2017). UNAIDS and the AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition (AVAC) also organised regional consultations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These meetings resulted in the preparation of the Good Participatory Practice (GPP) Guidelines, intended to provide systematic guidance on how to effectively engage all stakeholders in the design and implementation of HIV prevention trials (UNAIDS/AVAC 2007. The document points to the need for community engagement, but in the words of Peterson and Folayan (2017):…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation