2022
DOI: 10.47978/tus.2022.72.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Research and Comparative Analysis of the full Planet Engagement Planetary Gear Train

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for this is the geometric configuration of the inner and outer planets, whereby for the planetary gear train presented in this paper, in the ideal case where there are no manufacturing and assembly errors, the outer pins are subject to bigger deformations than the inner pins. This phenomenon is discussed in [12] and means that in the practical gear trains design, (20) could be useful for dimensioning the planets' bearings and the pins. In order to expand its applicability and be used for the calculation of the mesh load factor K γ , which is specified in ISO 6336-1 [13], (20) must be complemented by an equation accounting for the aforementioned peculiarities.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reason for this is the geometric configuration of the inner and outer planets, whereby for the planetary gear train presented in this paper, in the ideal case where there are no manufacturing and assembly errors, the outer pins are subject to bigger deformations than the inner pins. This phenomenon is discussed in [12] and means that in the practical gear trains design, (20) could be useful for dimensioning the planets' bearings and the pins. In order to expand its applicability and be used for the calculation of the mesh load factor K γ , which is specified in ISO 6336-1 [13], (20) must be complemented by an equation accounting for the aforementioned peculiarities.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where S =∑ 11 si , K 12 si , K 22 si -sun gear/inner planet mesh sub-matrices; K 11 ri , K 12 ri , K 22 ri -ring gear/outer planet mesh sub-matrices; K 11 ppi−n , K 12 ppi−n , K 22 ppi−n -inner planet/outer planet mesh sub-matrices; K 11 BCi , K 12 BCi , K 21 BCi , K 22 BCi -carrier/pinion support stiffness sub-matrices. The element meshing stiffness matrices can be defined as…”
Section: Building the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The double line represents the summation shaft in Figure 3. A more detailed comparison between different planetary and power branching geartrain types can be found in [5].…”
Section: Comparison Between Positive and Negative 2k-h Planetary Gear...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six test scenarios are considered in the study with different angles between the planet axles, as shown in Figure 4. A more detailed comparison between different planetary and power branching geartrain types can be found in [5].…”
Section: Load On Planet Axelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Planet carriers I and II are connected by this shaft passing through hollow sun gear II (5) connected to ring gear I (6). Ring gear I is supported by a large rolling bearing (7), and ring gear II ( 8) is permanently locked to the gear train casing (9).…”
Section: Application Examplementioning
confidence: 99%