A research framework of land use transition in Suzhou City coupled with land use structure and landscape multifunctionality

Liang, Xinyuan; Jin, Xiaobin; Ren, Jie; Gu, Zhengming; Zhou, Yongqiang

doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139932

Cited by 70 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 83 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…(3) the landscape ecological pattern responses, and the coupling relations between land use structure and land use multifunctionality [85][86][87].…”

Section: Impacts Of Lut On Ecosystem Servicesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In addition, applications of dynamic land use classification have also been highly recognized. In order to facilitate the targeted implementation of land management strategy, some scholars divided territorial space into rural protection area, suburban coordination area, urban agglomeration area, restricted development area and conditional construction area, and propose corresponding management measures and policies according to the characteristics of each specific area to regulate land use activities and address the relationship between economic development and environmental protection [87,120].…”

Section: Research On Optimal Regulation Of Lutmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Land Use Transitions: Progress, Challenges and Prospects

Long

Zhang

et al. 2021

Land

126

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The study of land use transition has generally become an important breakthrough point to deeply understand the human-land interaction and reveal major socio-economic development issues and related environmental effects. Attempting to provide scientific support for sustainable land use and environmental management, this review systematically analyzes the overall picture, development trends, key fields and hot topics of land use transition research in the past two decades from a comprehensive perspective, which incorporates two complementary parts including the systematic quantitative literature review (based on CiteSpace) and the traditional literature review. The results reveal that: a. current research presents three characteristics, i.e., focusing on complex social issues, driven by realistic demand, and research branches becoming clearer and more systematic; b. there are four key fields and hot topics in land use transition research, i.e., i. theories and hypothesis of land use transition; ii. measuring land use transition; iii. the impacts of land use transition on “social-economic-ecological” system; iv. drivers and regulation of land use transition. However, challenges remain, current land use transition research is still to some extent fragmented, and it should be enriched by integrating with land system science. The dominant morphology biased should be redressed by underlining the recessive morphology transition process. Meanwhile, new techniques and methods are necessary to observe, track, monitor and model the recessive attributes. Finally, distant drivers of land use transition should not be ignored in this rapidly globalizing world.

show abstract

“…(3) the landscape ecological pattern responses, and the coupling relations between land use structure and land use multifunctionality [85][86][87].…”

Section: Impacts Of Lut On Ecosystem Servicesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Research On Optimal Regulation Of Lutmentioning

confidence: 99%

Land Use Transitions: Progress, Challenges and Prospects

Long

Zhang

et al. 2021

Land

126

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, suburban tourist villages have seen notable variation characteristics at different rural development stages in land-use morphology, which are caused by rapid industrialization and urbanization. The division of stages involved in relevant studies is mainly based on leading industries, key events, moving T-test techniques, and the Mann-Kendall test [29]. Based on different leading industries in different stages, the development of suburban tourist villages can be divided into three stages: industrial development, agricultural development, and service industry development.…”

Section: Analysis Of Land-use Transition In Tourist Villages In the Smentioning

confidence: 99%

Land-Use Transition of Tourist Villages in the Metropolitan Suburbs and Its Driving Forces: A Case Study of She Village in Nanjing City, China

Chai

Qiao

et al. 2021

Land

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the context of the transition from “Native-rural China” to “Urban-rural China”, suburban villages have undergone rapid reconstruction of format, industry, and function. Aiming to reveal the evolution characteristics and driving forces, this study selected She Village, located in suburban areas of Nanjing, to analyze the changes of both dominant and recessive morphology of land use by employing participatory rural appraisal, remote sensing, and geographic information systems. The results showed that She Village witnessed three stages, including industrial development, ecological restoration, and service industry development, from 1980 to 2018, with more diversified management modes, multifunctional land use, and intensified land fragmentation. The drivers included natural resources, population growth, policy of Grain for Green, urban market demand, etc., the intensity of which showed trends of “increase–increase–increase”, “increase–decrease–decrease”, “periodically intermittent”, and “increase–decrease–increase” in turn. The tourist villages undergo three stages of industrial development, agricultural development, and service industry development, with periodical characteristics driven by top-down policies, the endogenous force of the village, and the radiation and diffusion of the city. This research deepens the understanding of the development process of suburban villages and provides a reference for land policy making and planning in other similar villages.

show abstract

“…LUCC and the trade-off between different land use types has formed serious land use conflicts represented by environmental damage, including habitat loss, biotic diversity decline, climate change, and soil degradation [4,7,8], as well as social problems, such as the vulnerability of places and people to climatic and economic or sociopolitical perturbations [9][10][11][12]. In addition, many land use transitions have taken place over wild areas both from the dominant morphology and recessive morphology with the quantity, spatial structure, and function change of land use and land cover [13][14][15]. On the one hand, land use transitions are largely driven by different land use types representing the benefits of different departments conflicting in space and will lead to a new balance of regional land use morphology patterns [16,17].On the other hand, land use transitions may trigger new land use conflicts during transformations between different land use types and allocation of land resources due to policy and institutional failures [14,18].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Spatially Explicit Evaluation and Driving Factor Identification of Land Use Conflict in Yangtze River Economic Belt

Cui

Kong

Chen

et al. 2021

Land

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Regional land use transitions driven by the adaptive reconciliation of existing land use conflict with socioeconomic development can lead to positive economic effects as well as new land use conflict. Although research on land use transition has progressed considerably, limited studies have explored the spatiotemporal dynamic pattern of land use conflict during the land use transition period. Previous evaluation approaches on land use conflict that mainly focus on status or potential conflict lack conflict intensity evaluation during the land use transition process. A new spatially explicit evaluation framework of land use conflict that directly examines three aspects of conflict, namely, ecological and agricultural (EAC), agricultural and construction (ACC), and ecological and construction (ECC) land conflicts based on ecological quality and agricultural suitability, is proposed in this study. The spatiotemporal dynamic pattern and driving factors of land use conflict in the Yangtze River Economic Belt of China in the period of 2000–2018 are evaluated. The results indicated that comprehensive land use conflict (CLUC) intensity slightly decreased by 9.91% and its barycenter showed a trend toward the west during 2000–2018. ACC is the most drastic conflict among the three aspects of conflict. The mean intensity of ACC reduced remarkably by 38.26%, while EAC increased by 33.15% and ECC increased by 28.28% during the research periods. The barycenter of EAC moved toward the east while the barycenter of ACC and ECC moved toward the west. The changes in the intensity and spreading pattern of land use conflict indices demonstrated the changes in the pattern of territorial space development. Total population, population density, per capita GDP, number of mobile phone users, and road density were strong drivers that influenced the land use conflict of territorial space. Multiple policy recommendations including improving territorial space planning and governance ability, and improving land use efficiency, were proposed to manage and resolve the land use conflict of territorial space. The results and conclusions of this study will help improve future regional land use policies and reduce land use conflict.

show abstract

A research framework of land use transition in Suzhou City coupled with land use structure and landscape multifunctionality

Cited by 70 publications

References 83 publications

Land Use Transitions: Progress, Challenges and Prospects

Land Use Transitions: Progress, Challenges and Prospects

Land-Use Transition of Tourist Villages in the Metropolitan Suburbs and Its Driving Forces: A Case Study of She Village in Nanjing City, China

Spatially Explicit Evaluation and Driving Factor Identification of Land Use Conflict in Yangtze River Economic Belt

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About