2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A research note on predicting the carcass yield of Korean native cattle (Hanwoo)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Inversely, the backfat thickness, marbling score and quality grade of carcass from steers were significantly higher (P b 0.001) than those from bulls (Table 3). These results were in accordance with previous studies reported by Field (1971), Seideman et al (1982), Steen and Kilpatrick (1995) and Lee et al (2005). Lindsay (1983) stated that muscle growth is greater in males than females, and castration results in diminished muscle growth.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Inversely, the backfat thickness, marbling score and quality grade of carcass from steers were significantly higher (P b 0.001) than those from bulls (Table 3). These results were in accordance with previous studies reported by Field (1971), Seideman et al (1982), Steen and Kilpatrick (1995) and Lee et al (2005). Lindsay (1983) stated that muscle growth is greater in males than females, and castration results in diminished muscle growth.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…20%, 33% and 47% for steers, bulls and cows, respectively; APGS 2003) (Lee et al 2005). 20%, 33% and 47% for steers, bulls and cows, respectively; APGS 2003) (Lee et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…REA affects positively all variables except the FT. Chen et al [9] found a similar situation in their research. Carcass weight, sex, nutritional status and measurement location (11)(12) th rib section) may have been affected the average value determined for the REA (85.538±1.978 cm 2 ) which differ from some research results. In some research, REA was reported between 68.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…In these researches, FT, REA, HCW (or cold carcass weight-CCW) and KPH% were used to determine the carcass yield; marbling, meat color, fat color, texture, and maturity parameters were used in quality grading. Through these parameters, the weights and percentages of retail cuts were predicted, yield and quality characteristics of the carcasses were compared by type of animal, age and gender, and economic slaughter weight was determined [4,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%