2011
DOI: 10.3801/iafss.fss.10-1059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Response Surface Methodology for Probabilistic Life Safety Analysis using Advanced Fire Engineering Tools

Abstract: In the paper, we evaluate the reliability of a successful evacuation using a CFD fire simulation tool and an evacuation model. Obviously, it is not possible to perform Monte Carlo analysis in a reasonable amount of time because of the high computational costs. Hence, we utilize an adaptive response surface method based on moving least squares in order to compute the reliability. To further decrease the necessary number of numerical evaluations, a preceding sensitivity analysis yields information about the vari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the mean of occupant density is taken as 1.0 persons/m 2 in this case. Due to the scarce available data on stochastic variables of occupant evacuation, standard deviations of uncertain parameters are usually assumed to be 10-20% of their mean values [34]. Herein, standard deviations of the child-occupant load ratio and occupant density are selected to be 20% and 10% of their mean values.…”
Section: Two-stage Nested Monte Carlo Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the mean of occupant density is taken as 1.0 persons/m 2 in this case. Due to the scarce available data on stochastic variables of occupant evacuation, standard deviations of uncertain parameters are usually assumed to be 10-20% of their mean values [34]. Herein, standard deviations of the child-occupant load ratio and occupant density are selected to be 20% and 10% of their mean values.…”
Section: Two-stage Nested Monte Carlo Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Random sampling can be both computationally expensive and time consuming since the number of calculations required increases with the number of variables in the system. To reduce the large number of analyses required for Monte-Carlo analysis, other work on the reliability of life safety and suppression systems in fire proposes the use of response surface modelling and linear regression techniques to identify critical variables for reliability estimation and then employ iterative algorithms to reduce the number of calculations required [11,12]. These techniques lead to less computationally expensive analyses than traditional Monte Carlo techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%