1999
DOI: 10.1093/ejil/10.1.108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A response to the American view as presented by Ruth Wedgwood

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A criminal trial opposed to crimes against humanity imposed from outside risks traumatizing populations and marks a serious social fabric that is jeopardized for peace processes by demolishing the fragile precondition balances (Hafner, Boon, Rübesame, Huston, 1999;Wedgood, 1999). The concrete infliction of punishment especially on political or ideological leaders in a conflictual context is seen as a sort of creating martyrs and provoking phenomena of violence.…”
Section: Punishment As a Means Of Restoring Peacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A criminal trial opposed to crimes against humanity imposed from outside risks traumatizing populations and marks a serious social fabric that is jeopardized for peace processes by demolishing the fragile precondition balances (Hafner, Boon, Rübesame, Huston, 1999;Wedgood, 1999). The concrete infliction of punishment especially on political or ideological leaders in a conflictual context is seen as a sort of creating martyrs and provoking phenomena of violence.…”
Section: Punishment As a Means Of Restoring Peacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crimes in the ICC's Statute are already established in international treaties and conventions and the Statute therefore does not create new laws 13 ; it establishes a new collective enforcement mechanism for already accepted universal norms. 14 This means that "the failure of the US to become a party to the ICC does not exempt its citizens from the universality already established." 15 Even though the ICC draws most immediately from territorial and national jurisdiction, it receives added support from the increasingly important notion of universal jurisdiction.…”
Section: Article 12 and The Icc's Jurisdictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 It constitutes a major concession by a majority of states which supported a broader jurisdictional regime. 23 When consensus on the principle of the Court's automatic jurisdiction over states parties was emerging, the debate on requirements of state consent was transposed into the context of non-states parties. On the one hand, Germany, relying on the right of states to enforce crimes under international law through universal jurisdiction and their ability to do jointly what they can do alone, sought a Court with universal jurisdiction independent of any further consent.…”
Section: Jurisdiction Ratione Locimentioning
confidence: 99%