2013
DOI: 10.1002/ange.201302350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Response to the Critical Comments on “One Molecule, Two Atoms, Three Views, Four Bonds?”

Abstract: The criticism expressed by Frenking and Hermann on the notion of quadruple bonding in C2 is answered using hard facts. Both experimental and computational data gauge the strength of the fourth bond as 16 kcal mol−1. The authors agree that chemical research goes profitably beyond “synthetic” chemistry.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is more amenable to a description by valence bond theory whereby it is found to exhibit a triple bond as in N2, but with the outer electrons forming a fourth bond of the Heitler-London type (5). This interpretation is not without controversy (3,(6)(7)(8)(9)(10) but is supported by detailed inspection of the manyelectron wavefunction (11).…”
Section: Comets | Dicarbon | Photodissociationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It is more amenable to a description by valence bond theory whereby it is found to exhibit a triple bond as in N2, but with the outer electrons forming a fourth bond of the Heitler-London type (5). This interpretation is not without controversy (3,(6)(7)(8)(9)(10) but is supported by detailed inspection of the manyelectron wavefunction (11).…”
Section: Comets | Dicarbon | Photodissociationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…[28]. Although many regard the debate to be stale [37,38], new papers are still being published regarding the interpretation and physical nature of AILs [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. NCI managed to solve one branch of QTAIM-associated problems, by showing that the absence of an AIL does not imply that electron density cannot be concentrated in the bonding region of an interaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 As a result of the near-degeneracy among multiple electron configurations, the majority of the low-lying C 2 electronic states are poorly described by a single dominant electron configuration. [2][3][4] Even its electronic ground state (X 1 Σ + g ), which is the subject of ongoing debates about the chemical bonding nature of C 2 , [5][6][7][8][9] is described by two dominant configurations, 0.828 2σ 2 g 2σ 2 u 1π 4 u − 0.324 2σ 2 g 1π 4 u 3σ 2 g + ..., at its equilibrium internuclear separation (R e ). 5 In comparison, the electronic ground states of most of the other C/N/O diatomic molecules as well as larger "relatives" of C 2 (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%