1999
DOI: 10.1109/19.769564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A result from the NIST watt balance and an analysis of uncertainties

Abstract: An improved determination of the ratio of power, measured in terms of the Josephson and quantum Hall effects, and also the meter, kilogram, and second, has been completed. The result is expressed as: W 90 =W = = = 1 + + + (8 6 6 6 87) 2 2 2 10 0 0 09. This is an order of magnitude improvement from the last NIST (formerly NBS) determination. The Type A relative standard uncertainty (statistical) is 30 nW/W, and the Type B relative standard uncertainty is 82 nW/W. Type B uncertainty components are listed and dis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus the binary programmable voltage standard system (Fig. 5) is primarily used for applications that require stable and programmable dc voltages such as watt-balance experiments [27], [28] and fast-reversed dc-dc comparisons [29], [30].…”
Section: Programmable Voltage Standardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the binary programmable voltage standard system (Fig. 5) is primarily used for applications that require stable and programmable dc voltages such as watt-balance experiments [27], [28] and fast-reversed dc-dc comparisons [29], [30].…”
Section: Programmable Voltage Standardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That experiment was a prototype for the next version in which the magnetic field was increased a factor of fifty using a superconducting magnet, resulting in similar increases in the force and voltage. During the next decade many improvements were made [ 125 , 126 ]. In 1998 the latest results were published [ 82 ] by E. R. Williams, R. L. Steiner, D. B. Newell, and P. T. Olsen.…”
Section: Electrical Metrology At Nist In the Twenty-first Centurymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total uncertainty is dominated by Type B uncertainty components, that is, components that have to be evaluated by means other than statistical analysis of repeated measurements. Of the possible Type B error sources [ 126 ] that contribute to the uncertainty, the three largest components arise from the following: (1) the index of refraction of air; (2) the present alignment procedures; and (3) residual knife-edge hysteresis effects during force measurements. Using the data discussed above Williams et al obtained a relative standard uncertainty of 0.087 μW/W.…”
Section: Electrical Metrology At Nist In the Twenty-first Centurymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previously reported results on the determination of Planck constant, h [ 6 , 7 ], the uncertainty was estimated at 8.7 × 10 −8 . (All uncertainties are relative standard uncertainties with k = 1, unless otherwise specified.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%