2023
DOI: 10.3390/math11244923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Result of Krasner in Categorial Form

Alessandro Linzi

Abstract: In 1957, M. Krasner described a complete valued field (K,v) as the inverse limit of a system of certain structures, called hyperfields, associated with (K,v). We put this result in purely category-theoretic terms by translating it into a limit construction in certain slice categories of the category of valued hyperfields and their homomorphisms. We replace the original metric-dependent arguments employed by Krasner with a clean and elegant transition to certain slice categories.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its commutative version, i.e., the canonical hypergroup, dates back to the beginning of 1970s, when Mittas [25] studied it as an independent structure in the framework of valuation theory, and not just as the additive structure of a hyperfield. In fact, this was the way that canonical hypergroups appeared in the first studies of Krasner [26] and have continued to be investigated as the additive structure of the Krasner hyperfields and the hypercompositional structure with the most applications in different areas, e.g., valuation theory [27][28][29], algebraic geometry [30], number theory, affine algebraic group schemes [31], matroids theory [32], tropical geometry [33], and hypermodules [34]. The state of the art in hyperfield theory was included in an article recently published by Ch.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its commutative version, i.e., the canonical hypergroup, dates back to the beginning of 1970s, when Mittas [25] studied it as an independent structure in the framework of valuation theory, and not just as the additive structure of a hyperfield. In fact, this was the way that canonical hypergroups appeared in the first studies of Krasner [26] and have continued to be investigated as the additive structure of the Krasner hyperfields and the hypercompositional structure with the most applications in different areas, e.g., valuation theory [27][28][29], algebraic geometry [30], number theory, affine algebraic group schemes [31], matroids theory [32], tropical geometry [33], and hypermodules [34]. The state of the art in hyperfield theory was included in an article recently published by Ch.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%