2017
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A retinoraphe projection regulates serotonergic activity and looming-evoked defensive behaviour

Abstract: Animals promote their survival by avoiding rapidly approaching objects that indicate threats. In mice, looming-evoked defensive responses are triggered by the superior colliculus (SC) which receives direct retinal inputs. However, the specific neural circuits that begin in the retina and mediate this important behaviour remain unclear. Here we identify a subset of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) that controls mouse looming-evoked defensive responses through axonal collaterals to the dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN) an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
78
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[43][44][45]) provides the suitable substrate for the observed behavioural diversity. The presence of functional degeneracy is consistent with recent studies reporting that the expression of defensive responses can be affected by activation of multiple neuronal pathways [9,10,[46][47][48][49][50]. However our current understanding of the anatomical and functional substrates of this diversity is still insufficient and limited to the locomotion phenotype.…”
Section: The Mapping Between Stimulus and Response Is Not Uniquely Desupporting
confidence: 85%
“…[43][44][45]) provides the suitable substrate for the observed behavioural diversity. The presence of functional degeneracy is consistent with recent studies reporting that the expression of defensive responses can be affected by activation of multiple neuronal pathways [9,10,[46][47][48][49][50]. However our current understanding of the anatomical and functional substrates of this diversity is still insufficient and limited to the locomotion phenotype.…”
Section: The Mapping Between Stimulus and Response Is Not Uniquely Desupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Looming-evoked defensive responses were tested with a behavioral assay of a rapidly expanding dark disk stimulus (looming stimulus of −2 degrees of the visual angle expanded to 20 degrees in 250 ms) presented overhead 15 times over 10.75 s (Fig. 1c ) 5 , 9 , 10 . Under this paradigm, 98.3 ± 0.7% of saline-mice responded by fleeing from the center of the arena and freezing (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies in rodents documented the role of midbrain structures for rapid processing of threatening stimuli, supporting an important role of subcortical pathway to amygdala 8 , 9 . Using looming stimulations that mimic an approaching aerial predator to initiate a rapid escape response 5 , 10 , a superior colliculus (SC)-lateral posterior nucleus (LP)-basolateral amygdala (BLA) pathway has been revealed for detecting visual threats in mice 9 . That is in agreement with neuroimaging studies in healthy human subjects report co-activation of subcortical structures of the amygdala, the SC, and the pulvinar nucleus of the thalamus during non-conscious visual perception of fearful stimuli 11 14 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looming-evoked defensive behaviors in rodents mimicking response to aerial predators have recently been used to study the neural circuitry underlying instinctive defensive behaviors [4]. We have previously interpreted a cell-specific neural pathway, from the medial region of the intermediate layer of the superior colliculus (SC) that projects to the lateral posterior thalamic nucleus (LP), to mediate innate freezing behavior resulting from looming stimuli [5,6]. Additionally, another pathway in which PV + neurons in the superficial layer of SC project to the parabigeminal nucleus (PBGN) mediates innate flight behavior [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%