1996
DOI: 10.1016/0045-7825(96)01024-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A retrofit based methodology for the fast generation and optimization of large-scale mesh partitions: beyond the minimum interface size criterion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This cost function takes into account constraints such as sub-domain aspect ratio, communication between sub-domains, load balance etc. In [37] the authors show that a two-step approach is always better than the conventional one-step approach that attempts to minimize only the edge-cut, and hence the communication.…”
Section: Iiiiiiiii Iiiiii! Iiiiiiiililiiiiii Iiiii I Iii Iiii Iiiiiiimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This cost function takes into account constraints such as sub-domain aspect ratio, communication between sub-domains, load balance etc. In [37] the authors show that a two-step approach is always better than the conventional one-step approach that attempts to minimize only the edge-cut, and hence the communication.…”
Section: Iiiiiiiii Iiiiii! Iiiiiiiililiiiiii Iiiii I Iii Iiii Iiiiiiimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also consider partitioning this mesh into 500 subdomains for computations on 500 processors, in order to provide at least one example of the parallel scalability for a fixed problem size of our current massively parallel implementation of the FETI method. More specifically, in order to illustrate recommendation R3, we consider three different mesh decomposition strategies partitioning the mesh as is, with particular attention to the subdomain aspect ratio using the optimizers described in [15,16].…”
Section: Application To the Analysis Of A Mockup Reentry Vehiclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated earlier, parallel sparse direct algorithms do not scale well in the sense defined in this paper, particularly for these small size coarse problems. Furthermore, we note that because the system matrix GTQGl needs be factored only once, but the coarse problem (16) must be solved twice at each FETI iteration, it is essential to focus on a strategy that addresses not only the factorization of GFQGI, but most importantly the subsequent forward and backward substitutions. Indeed, the scalable parallelization of the direct solution of sparse lower and upper triangular systems is even more challenging than that of the factorization of a sparse matrix.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations