“…The deletion and duplication rates were 65.5 and 9.7% respectively. These frequencies are comparable to previous reports of 62–72.2% for deletions and 8.8–13.3% for duplications (Cho et al, ; Deepha et al, ; Guo et al, ; Vieitez et al, ; Rani et al, ; Juan‐Mateu et al, ; Ma et al, ; Mohammed et al, ; Okubo, Goto, et al, , ; Takeshima et al, ; Vengalil et al, ; Xu et al, ; Yang et al, ). The frequencies of large deletions and duplications may appear anomalous in some previous reports because of smaller cohort size or due to use of screening methods that are not able to detect the full spectrum of mutations (Rani et al, ; Vengalil et al, ).…”