2015
DOI: 10.5152/ucd.2014.2453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A retrospective analysis of 93 cases with anorectal abscess in a rural state hospital

Abstract: Objective: Anorectal abscess is a clinical condition frequently encountered in daily surgical practice and recurrences may occur despite treatment with adequate incision and drainage. The primary aim of this study was to analyze the variables that may have resulted in recurrent anorectal abscess, retrospectively. Material and Methods:Ninety-three patients out of 149 patients who underwent surgery for anorectal abscess at our center between 2011-2012 were included in this study. Data regarding age, gender, pres… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the studied sample, most patients showed no sign of recurrence of the abscess and 66.1% did not develop an anal fistula. Those results are in agreement with the published literature that states abscess recurrence will occur in only 3% to 44% of the patients while a fistula will develop in 26% to 50% of the patients following I&D. An association between the site of the abscess and the risk of recurrence (P = 0.353) or developing a fistula (P = 0.38) was not evident in our sample which is consistent with previous studies [8,9]. In addition, no link was found between the duration from diagnosis of the abscess until its drainage on the risk of recurrence (P = 0.13) or recurrence of the abscess.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In the studied sample, most patients showed no sign of recurrence of the abscess and 66.1% did not develop an anal fistula. Those results are in agreement with the published literature that states abscess recurrence will occur in only 3% to 44% of the patients while a fistula will develop in 26% to 50% of the patients following I&D. An association between the site of the abscess and the risk of recurrence (P = 0.353) or developing a fistula (P = 0.38) was not evident in our sample which is consistent with previous studies [8,9]. In addition, no link was found between the duration from diagnosis of the abscess until its drainage on the risk of recurrence (P = 0.13) or recurrence of the abscess.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Despite limited research on risk factors for mortality, there is a multitude of research in terms of risk factors for recurrence of perirectal abscess. Akkapulu et al demonstrate no association between recurrence of abscess and sex, age, and hospital length of stay [ 44 ]. Additionally, diabetes and obesity were connected to a significant increase in patients developing anorectal abscesses, but they were not significant in readmission to the hospital for anorectal abscess [ 4 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of supralevator abscess originate from the glandular crypts [1,4]. In this case, it seems the abscess developed from traumatic perforation by a fish bone, spreading for an inter-sphincteric fistulae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original infection is cryptoglandular in 90% of cases. Other aetiologies result from downward spread of pelvic infection, inflammatory bowel disease or traumatic incidents [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%