2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.06.1216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Retrospective Analysis of Causes and Outcomes of Percutaneous Closure Device Failure – A Real Life Experience from a Large Volume CENTRE

Abstract: surgery was 6.8% (4/59) and 22% (13/59), respectively, with almost a third (4/13) of these patients dying from cancer rather than aneurysm rupture. Conclusion: The short-term aneurysm-related mortality in elective turndowns is low, with a significant number of patients succumbing for other reasons. Given the plethora of treatment options available, objective selection of patients who will benefit most from intervention is increasingly important.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Total percutaneous access has become the most used access strategy in standard and complex EVAR. [11][12][13] As a result of an increase in endovascular techniques and indications, patients undergoing (complex) endovascular aortic aneurysm repair have become older with more comorbidities and have undergone more often previous aortic intervention with surgical access of the femoral arteries. 14 A re-do percutaneous access is often not considered in these patients with a prior surgical femoral artery exposure because of expectation of technical failure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total percutaneous access has become the most used access strategy in standard and complex EVAR. [11][12][13] As a result of an increase in endovascular techniques and indications, patients undergoing (complex) endovascular aortic aneurysm repair have become older with more comorbidities and have undergone more often previous aortic intervention with surgical access of the femoral arteries. 14 A re-do percutaneous access is often not considered in these patients with a prior surgical femoral artery exposure because of expectation of technical failure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%