A Retrospective Analysis of Early and Immediately Loaded Osseotite Implants in Cross‐Arch Rehabilitations in Edentulous Maxillas and Mandibles Up to 7 Years

Browaeys, Hilde; Defrancq, J.; Dierens, Melissa; Miremadi, Resa; Vandeweghe, Stefan; Velde, Tommie Van de; Bruyn, Hugo De

doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00367.x

Cited by 33 publications

(35 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…However, 41 of these studies were excluded after full‐text reading, as they did not fulfill all criteria. Reasons for exclusion can be seen in Table . A PRISMA 2009 flow diagram of the study selection can be seen in Figure .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Long term follow‐up of titanium implants installed in block‐grafted areas: A systematic review

Fuglsig

Thorn

Ingerslev

et al. 2018

Clin Implant Dent Rel Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background An enduring clinical question concerns the outcome (ie, success) of implants placed in areas grafted with block‐grafts. Objective To undertake a systematic review of the literature on the long term results (≥5 years) of implants placed in maxillofacial areas grafted with any type of osseous block‐grafts in two‐stage surgeries. Further, the review addresses how available success criteria were used within the studies. Materials and Methods The MEDLINE (PubMed) and EMBASE bibliographic databases were searched up to March 2017 for studies evaluating the long term results of implants placed in grafted areas. The search strategy was restricted to English language publications using combined terms which referred to the treatment method (implants placed in areas grafted with bone blocks), and follow‐up characteristics (≥5 years and assessment of at least one parameter related to implant success criteria). To qualify for inclusion, studies should present outcome measurements indicating the success (or at least the survival) of the implants. Results The search strategy yielded 17 studies, which were included in this systematic review. These studies presented survival rates ranging from 88.7% (after 15 years follow‐up) to 98.7% (after 5 years follow‐up). Five studies presented data based on predefined success criteria with success rates ranging from 86.8% to 100%. In these studies, the term “success” was often not properly defined. Conclusion The long term survival (≥5 years) of implants placed into block‐grafted areas in two‐stage surgeries was not lower than 75%, while success rates ranged from 86.8% to 100%. Although it was possible to identify published success criteria for implant follow‐up, there is no broad consensus on how to report implant success in a consistent manner.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Long term follow‐up of titanium implants installed in block‐grafted areas: A systematic review

Fuglsig

Thorn

Ingerslev

et al. 2018

Clin Implant Dent Rel Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Figure 2 is derived from the data reported by Browaeys et al. (19), who studied over 700 dual acid‐etched surface implants that were loaded, within 10 days after placement, with full cross‐arch bridges. Radiographs were available for 53 implants at the time of surgery and at 0–3 and 3–6 months post‐surgery.…”

Section: Radiography For Diagnosis Of Peri‐implant Bone Levelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Radiographic evaluation of modern oral implants with emphasis on crestal bone level and relevance to peri‐implant health

Bruyn¹,

Vandeweghe²,

Ruyffelaert³

et al. 2013

Periodontology 2000

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Implant stability and maintenance of stable crestal bone level are prerequisites for the successful long-term function of oral implants, and continuous crestal bone loss constitutes a threat to the longevity of implant-supported prosthetic constructions. The prevalence/incidence and reasons for crestal bone loss are under debate. Some authors regard infection (i.e. peri-implantitis) as the cause for virtually all bone loss, while others see crestal bone loss as an unavoidable phenomenon following surgery and implant loading. Irrespective of the cause of continuous crestal bone loss, correct usage and scientifically sound interpretation of radiographs are of utmost importance for evaluation of oral implants. The periapical radiographic technique is currently the preferred method for evaluating implant health based on bone loss, and digital radiographs allow easy standardization of the image contrast. It is suggested that baseline radiographs should be taken at the time the transmucosal part pierces the mucosal tissues and annually thereafter. The number of unreadable radiographs should be presented in scientific publications to give insights into the quality of the radiographic examination. It is suggested that not only mean values, but also the range of bone levels, should be presented to describe the proportion of implants that show continuous crestal bone loss. In the absence of other clinical symptoms, bleeding on probing around implants seems to be a weak indicator of ongoing or future loss of crestal bone. According to recent longitudinal studies on modern implant surfaces peri-implantitis defined as 'infection with suppuration associated with clinically significant progressing crestal bone loss' occurs with a prevalence of less than 5 % in implants with 10 years in function.

show abstract

“…Beside several procedures and materials for augmenting bone height, sinus lifting has become a standard procedure to gain bone height in the posterior maxilla for placement of long dental implants. 20 In this study, panoramic radiographs which have overestimated the need for sinus augmentation were used for pretreatment planning. 21 Because all implants which were used in this study had the same design type and same surface characteristics, although the potential differences between implant systems could be disregarded.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Maxillary Sinus Lifting Procedures Using Xenogeneic Cortico-Cancellous Graft Material With Simultaneous Implant Placement: A 1- To 3-Year Follow-Up

Kılınç¹,

Ataol²,

Dayı³

2018

Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the clinical outcomes of laterally approached sinus floor lifting with xenografts and simultaneously dental implant placement procedures. Material and methods:All patients treated with sinus lifting and simultaneous implant placement procedure and were followed for at least 1 year were retrospectively selected for this study. The lateral window technique was performed using a xenogeneic corticocancellous grafting material and submerged implants were placed immediately. Survival rates of implants and clinical features of patients and implants were evaluated.Results : A sample of 30 patients, 42 implants were placed according to the one-stage approach. Residual preoperatively alveolar ridge height varied between 3 and 6 mm with a mean of 4.58 mm and the bone gain at 1-year follow-up varied between 6 mm and 10 mm with a mean of 8.6 mm. Only two implants were lost before loading and overall survival rate was 96% for the implant-based analysis. Conclusions:Maxillary sinus lifting procedure with xenogeneic cortico-cancellous graft material and simultaneously implant placement was showed as a predictable and successful treatment modality.

show abstract

A Retrospective Analysis of Early and Immediately Loaded Osseotite Implants in Cross‐Arch Rehabilitations in Edentulous Maxillas and Mandibles Up to 7 Years

Cited by 33 publications

References 24 publications

Long term follow‐up of titanium implants installed in block‐grafted areas: A systematic review

Long term follow‐up of titanium implants installed in block‐grafted areas: A systematic review

Radiographic evaluation of modern oral implants with emphasis on crestal bone level and relevance to peri‐implant health

Maxillary Sinus Lifting Procedures Using Xenogeneic Cortico-Cancellous Graft Material With Simultaneous Implant Placement: A 1- To 3-Year Follow-Up

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About