A retrospective analysis of surgery in prestyloid parapharyngeal tumors: Lateral approaches vs transoral robotic surgery

Abstract

Objective: Surgery is the standard treatment for most tumors in the prestyloid parapharyngeal space (PPS) but it can be a challenging procedure because of the anatomical complexity of the area. Prestyloid surgery can be performed with various lateral approaches or with a medial approach using transoral robotic surgery (TORS)-either alone or in combination with a transcervical incision. We have retrospectively compared our center's results with lateral and medial approaches.Methods: Between 2015 and 2020, 28 patients with prestyloid PPS tumors underwent surgery at our center: 14 with lateral approaches, including transcervical, transcervical-parotid, and transcervical-mandibular, and 14 with medial approaches (12 with TORS and two with TORS plus a transcervical incision). We compared surgical time, postsurgical complications, length of hospital stay, need for feeding tube, and relapse-free survival in the two patient groups.Results: Pleomorphic adenoma was the most frequent tumor and 60.7% of the tumors were benign. Tumor volume and maximum length were similar in the two groups of patients. Intraoperative image guidance and ultrasound were used in 33% of TORS. TORS was associated with less surgical time, fewer complications, and shorter hospital stays. Recurrence rates were similar in the two groups. Conclusion:The medial approach by TORS offers superior results in prestyloid tumors than the open lateral approach and can be refined by intraoperative guidance.

Perception of Young European Otolaryngologists toward Transoral Robotic Surgery in Head and Neck Oncology and Surgery

“…Thus, many studies supported that the video endoscope of the Da Vinci robot offers a large, magnified view of confined spaces of most surgical fields in otolaryngology, which may be associated with better operative outcomes than those of conventional approaches [ 10 , 11 , 12 ]. The TORS-related shorter hospital length and fewer postoperative complication rates were additional perceptions of European OTOs that corroborate the findings of the literature [ 13 , 14 ].…”

“…Further efforts are needed to develop robotic programs in European academic centers according to the potential advantages of TORS over conventional head and neck surgeries [ 13 , 14 ]. An American study reported that training was associated with a lower rate of positive margins compared to non-robotic surgery [ 25 ].…”