1985
DOI: 10.3109/10826088509056358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Retrospective Assessment of Inhalant Abuse in the Barrio: Implications for Prevention

Abstract: An interview questionnaire was administered to a group of primarily Hispanic identified inhalant users (N = 40) and a comparison group of neighborhood youths (N = 17) in the barrio of Phoenix, Arizona. This retrospective assessment revealed that inhalant abusers had a history of multiple problems, stressors, and difficulty with school and the criminal justice system; initiated drug use between the ages of 10 and 15; confined their drug use primarily to marijuana, alcohol, and inhalants; and often came from fam… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The greater lifetime prevalence and thirty-day prevalence rates for dropouts and controls are consistent with findings by other researchers (e.g., Bachrach & Sandler, 1985;Medina-Mora et al, 1978;SCNAC, 1987;Winburn & Hays, 1974). Indeed, it is apparent that a relationship exists between enrollment status and volatile solvent abuse--youths who drop out of school are more likely to have ever used volatile solvents than their in-school counterparts, and thirty-day prevalence rates show that dropouts are more likely to be currently involved with volatile solvents than controls.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The greater lifetime prevalence and thirty-day prevalence rates for dropouts and controls are consistent with findings by other researchers (e.g., Bachrach & Sandler, 1985;Medina-Mora et al, 1978;SCNAC, 1987;Winburn & Hays, 1974). Indeed, it is apparent that a relationship exists between enrollment status and volatile solvent abuse--youths who drop out of school are more likely to have ever used volatile solvents than their in-school counterparts, and thirty-day prevalence rates show that dropouts are more likely to be currently involved with volatile solvents than controls.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…A trend for higher use of solvents in areas of lower socioeconomic status was found for Mexican-American youth (Bachrach & Sandler, 1985). Padilla et al (1979) compared the volatile solvent use rates of 457 Mexican-American youth in the barrio to volatile solvent use rates from a national sample--they found that volatile solvent users in barrios were more likely to have ever used volatile solvents, and are at least 14 times more likely to be currently using volatile solvents.…”
Section: Solvent Abuse Related Problemsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Studies of specific ethnic populations, such as Cuban immigrants (Szapocznik, Daruna, Scopetta, & De Los Angeles Aranalde, 1977), Alaskan Eskimo youth (Zebrowski & Gregory, 1996), reservation-residing American Indian youth (Beauvais, Oetting, & Edwards, 1985), and residents of urban Barrio areas (Bachrach & Sandler, 1985) have often identified high prevalence of VSM and associated etiological factors (Howard, Walker, Walker, Cottler, & Compton, 1999).…”
Section: Race/ethnicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large initial sample size is an important consideration as well, owing to the smaller prevalence rates for the later stages of inhalant abuse. The literature suggests the inclusion of a number of factors, such as family history of drug abuse, socioeconomic status (Bachrach & Sandler, 1985), disrupted family structure, peer associations, and social adjustment (Oetting et al 1988), in order to explain or to predict the progression of inhalant abuse. The data collected would not be anonymous, but would be confidential; however, in order to collect valid self-report data, the researchers must establish some rapport with the respondents to encourage honest responses.…”
Section: Longitudinal Cohortmentioning
confidence: 99%