13Circadian timekeeping in mammalian cells involves daily cycles of CRYPTOCHROME-dependent 14 transcriptional feedback repression. Ablation of CRY in mice leads to reduced growth and numerous 15 other phenotypes for reasons that are not well understood. Here, we find that cells adapt to CRY 16 deficiency by extensive remodelling of the proteome, phosphoproteome and ionome, with twice the 17 number of circadian-regulated proteins and phosphopeptides as well as increased rhythmic ion 18 transport compared to wild-type cells. CRY-deficient cells also have increased protein synthesis and 19 reduced proteasomal degradation, as well as an altered energetic state. These adaptations render cells 20 more sensitive to stress, and may provide an explanation for the wide-ranging phenotypes of CRY-21 deficient mice. We suggest that daily rhythms in cellular protein abundance are damped by CRY-22 mediated repression to facilitate daily cycles of proteome renewal whilst maintaining protein 23 homeostasis. 24 25 complex containing the activating transcription factors (BMAL1 and CLOCK or NPAS2). The 52 stability, interactions and nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of the encoded PER and CRY proteins is 53 regulated post-translationally until, many hours later, they repress the activity of BMAL1-containing 54 complexes. This transcriptional-translational feedback loop (TTFL) is proposed as the basis of 55 circadian timekeeping in mammalian cells [15]. Genes whose transcription are regulated by core 56 TTFL factors are thought to drive circadian rhythms in the encoded proteins to control myriad cellular 57 functions [13,14]. 58 59 Within the TTFL model of circadian rhythm generation, CRY proteins are the essential repressors of 60 CLOCK/BMAL1 activity [16,17], and have long been considered indispensable for circadian 61 rhythms in vivo and cells ex vivo [18][19][20][21][22]. In contrast, PER proteins play critical signalling and 62 scaffolding roles, required for the nuclear import and targeting of CRY to BMAL1-containing 63 complexes [17]. Recently however, we found that CRY-deficient cells, tissues and mice retain the 64 capacity for circadian timing, in the absence of canonical TTFL function [23]. Similarly, circadian 65 oscillations were retained in cells and tissue slices lacking BMAL1 [24]. Whilst we cannot exclude 66 the presence of some unknown transcriptional feedback-driven oscillation, many previous 67 observations argue against this [12,17,19,21,22,[25][26][27][28]. Recent evidence supports the hypothesis that 68 a conserved post-translational cytosolic oscillator (PTO, or "cytoscillator") may be responsible for 69 generating the oscillation from which circadian transcriptional cycles derive [12,29,30]. Thus, while 70 the TTFL is crucial for rhythmic robustness and co-ordinating outputs, it is not required for generation 71 of rhythms. 72
73The complex phenotype of mice lacking CRY proteins has been interpreted to mean that circadian 74 timekeeping is crucial for organismal physiology. The emerging observations that circadia...