2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jons.2018.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A retrospective study on potential drug interactions: A single center experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, studies that included both pharmacokinetic-and pharmacodynamic-based DDIs and studies that used medication lists from the EHR (rather than those verified by patients during medication reconciliation) had higher rates of potential DDIs. 38,39 Our DDI prevalence of approximately 52% falls in the middle of those reported by past investigations. In terms of methodology, extracting medication data from the EHR and not being able to resolve medication days supply or whether medications were prescribed on an as-needed basis likely resulted in a higher DDI prevalence in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, studies that included both pharmacokinetic-and pharmacodynamic-based DDIs and studies that used medication lists from the EHR (rather than those verified by patients during medication reconciliation) had higher rates of potential DDIs. 38,39 Our DDI prevalence of approximately 52% falls in the middle of those reported by past investigations. In terms of methodology, extracting medication data from the EHR and not being able to resolve medication days supply or whether medications were prescribed on an as-needed basis likely resulted in a higher DDI prevalence in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…28 advanced cancer, estimating DDIs to occur in 27%-78% of patients. [37][38][39][40][41][42] The large differences in these estimates are likely due to methodological differences among studies. For instance, studies that included both pharmacokinetic-and pharmacodynamic-based DDIs and studies that used medication lists from the EHR (rather than those verified by patients during medication reconciliation) had higher rates of potential DDIs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, strong CYP3A4 iso-enzyme inhibitors, such as itraconazole, can increase the plasma concentrations and pharmacologic effects of fentanyl, due to this CYP3A4 inhibitor's potential reduction in the metabolic clearance of this opioid. More examples may follow, as bicalutamide and dexamethasone, which also affect the CYP3A4 enzyme, can increase or decrease (respectively) the level or effect of fentanyl [52]. Therefore, it is necessary to watch for the cumulative narcotic effects of fentanyl when this drug is administered with another chemotherapeutics.…”
Section: Effect On Cancer Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 7 Drug interactions are either real drug interactions that can be established in clinical practice or potential drug–drug interactions (PDDIs) in which a potentially harmful combination occurs. 8 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Drug interactions are either real drug interactions that can be established in clinical practice or potential drug-drug interactions (PDDIs) in which a potentially harmful combination occurs. 8 The consequences of these DDIs vary, from minor and undetectable to severe enough that can affect the patient's health, increase the treatment costs, or even can lead to death. 9 There are many factors associated with the occurrence of DDIs, and one of them is the use of multiple drug treatments, which might be necessary to achieve the required therapeutic goal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%