2013
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2012.2215160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review for Conductive Polymer Piezoresistive Composites and a Development of a Compliant Pressure Transducer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Measuring capacitance is not as straightforward as measuring resistance, which can be done with inexpensive and simple circuitry [35,36] [12,14]. However, the most concerning drawback of those approaches was costs.…”
Section: Capacitance Measurement With a Lm555 In Modified Astable Opementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Measuring capacitance is not as straightforward as measuring resistance, which can be done with inexpensive and simple circuitry [35,36] [12,14]. However, the most concerning drawback of those approaches was costs.…”
Section: Capacitance Measurement With a Lm555 In Modified Astable Opementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(ii) RFSR influence: as (35) shows, even if R ≪ RFSR, the dependence on RFSR still exists. Equations (16) through (18) are worth to be evaluated in order to recall how nonlinear the relation between resistance and stress is.…”
Section: Journal Of Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very recently, a resistive-type pressure sensor made of self-healing materials was demonstrated, showing that the self-healing capability of natural skin could be mimicked in artificial electronic skins 21 . Many of the reported resistive-type sensors function based on bulk piezoresistivity and employ composites of insulating polymers and conductive additives as the active layer 22 . However, the performance of these devices is limited by the bulk mechanical properties of the rubbers used, for instance, poor sensitivity due to a relatively large modulus, creep and slow response time due to viscoelasticity and poor signal stability as a function of temperature due to thermal expansion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reducing the noise in FSRs is also an active research trend. For instance, Wang and Li have demonstrated that the vulcanization of the sensor's electrodes is an effective method for reducing noise in such devices [39]. Nonetheless, it must be remarked that a measuring uncertainty of 0.1% is a very good result considering that a repeatability error of 2.5% has been stated in the sensor's datasheet [11].…”
Section: Trimming the Offset Resistances For R 1 = Rmentioning
confidence: 99%