2018
DOI: 10.29245/2578-3009/2018/5.1137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of a Diagnostic Tool: Galactomannan

Abstract: Invasive fungal infections, including invasive aspergillosis are associated with a high morbidity and mortality especially in immunocompromised patients. Diagnosis is often difficult due to several factors such as delay in clinical suspicion and the lack of spesific clinical findings. Galactomannan is a polysaccharide cell wall component of Aspergillus and galactomannan antigen detection has become widely used for diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis. Here, we tried to discuss the diagnostic value of the galact… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4,6 GM is a cell wall component of Aspergillus spp., which is released during cell replication. 2,7 We used a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to detect fungal antigens. Fungal antigen measurements are limited by low sensitivity and low specificity due to the widespread occurrence of Aspergillus spp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,6 GM is a cell wall component of Aspergillus spp., which is released during cell replication. 2,7 We used a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to detect fungal antigens. Fungal antigen measurements are limited by low sensitivity and low specificity due to the widespread occurrence of Aspergillus spp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…may be misleading. The low sensitivity and low positive predictive value of serum galactomannan are well documented [7, 8]. The detection of galactomannan in specimens other than serum specimens may provide additional evidence for invasive aspergillosis via a noninvasive method and may help to exclude false-positive or false-negative test results obtained using serum samples [9], which could not be done in this case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%