2018
DOI: 10.7557/3.4474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of age estimation methods in marine mammals with special reference to monodontids

Abstract: This paper presents a critical review of methods for estimating absolute or relative age in marine mammals. Absolute age is achieved by counting growth layer groups (GLGs) in hard structures such as teeth, ear plugs, baleen, bones and claws. Relative age can be obtained by methods such as aspartic acid racemisation, genetic telomeres, bone mineral density, fatty acid signatures and other methods. Each method is discussed in detail. Accuracy and precision, including inter-reader calibration and anomalies, as we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 176 publications
(324 reference statements)
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The teeth from Newfoundland animals were extracted from decomposed specimens, air dried and stored whole until being sectioned for this study. Similar to other odontocetes [29][30][31], H. ampullatus dentine is laminated, with one clear and one opaque layer defining each annual GLG within the cone of the tooth [22] (Fig 2). Only teeth with a clear neo-natal line and defined GLG structure across the first five years were retained for isotope analysis, reducing our sample size to 50 individuals (N = 6 from Iceland, N = 42 from Labrador, N = 2 from Newfoundland).…”
Section: Tooth Collection and Dentine Samplingmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The teeth from Newfoundland animals were extracted from decomposed specimens, air dried and stored whole until being sectioned for this study. Similar to other odontocetes [29][30][31], H. ampullatus dentine is laminated, with one clear and one opaque layer defining each annual GLG within the cone of the tooth [22] (Fig 2). Only teeth with a clear neo-natal line and defined GLG structure across the first five years were retained for isotope analysis, reducing our sample size to 50 individuals (N = 6 from Iceland, N = 42 from Labrador, N = 2 from Newfoundland).…”
Section: Tooth Collection and Dentine Samplingmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Average lengths of 240-260 cm in adults (Burgess, Lanyon & Keeley, 2012;Marsh, 1980) fit with data based on our equation, where limiting values for body weight and length of dugongs in our study were approximately 309 kg and 266 cm, respectively. In the present study, the absolute age of each animal was unknown, so the standard practice of tusk GLGs counts was used for age estimation (Marsh, 1980;Nishiwaki & Marsh, 1985;Read, Hohn & Lockyer, 2018). Then that chronological age was correlated with body morphometric indices, finding significant relationships with both body weight and length.…”
Section: Sex Differences In Growth Ratesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The tusks erupt later, primarily in males, but occasionally in females ( Marsh, 1980 ). The tusks are the only teeth present throughout life, and so have been used for age estimation ( Marsh, 1980 ; Mitchell, 1976 ; Read, Hohn & Lockyer, 2018 ) through counts of dentin growth layer groups (GLGs). The technique was first described by Scheffer in 1970 ( Scheffer, 1970 ) and is now broadly accepted for age estimation of dugongs ( Adulyanukosol, Amorena & Miyazaki, 1998 ; Kasuya & Nishiwaki, 1978 ; Marsh, 1980 ; Mitchell, 1976 ; Mitchell, 1978 ; Read, Hohn & Lockyer, 2018 ; Scheffer, 1970 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One particular shortcoming is our approach to age estimation based on body length, which could be improved using teeth aging methods [57][58][59] in the future. In addition to these obstructions, the use of stranded and bycaught animals may introduce a bias, since a cause of death could not be diagnosed for all of the animals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%