2016
DOI: 10.1680/bren.14.00039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of arching and compressive membrane action in concrete bridges

Abstract: It is over a century ago that testing of reinforced concrete slabs by the pioneers of the material such as Lord, Turner and Maillart showed that restrained slabs could carry significant loads. Since that time the interest in and knowledge of the internal arching, or compressive membrane action, that enhances the strength of reinforced concrete has waxed and waned. In this paper, definitions of key terms such as arching action, compressive membrane action and geometric arching are given. A review of key twentie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For an unrestrained beam or slab this change in length, or dilation, is often ignored, although Beeby and Faithibitaraf (2001) and Mathias et al (2019) note that this can be an unsafe assumption. For a restrained or part restrained structure the restraint of this dilation causes some internal arching or CMA which may stiffen the structure, reduce crack widths and increase capacity (Collings and Sagaseta, 2016) under localised wheel axle or vehicle loading; bridge deck slabs offer this restraint. It is proposed that the local dilation strains may be added into the phase-2 analysis as a load case using an effective strain approach described in the next section.…”
Section: K =mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For an unrestrained beam or slab this change in length, or dilation, is often ignored, although Beeby and Faithibitaraf (2001) and Mathias et al (2019) note that this can be an unsafe assumption. For a restrained or part restrained structure the restraint of this dilation causes some internal arching or CMA which may stiffen the structure, reduce crack widths and increase capacity (Collings and Sagaseta, 2016) under localised wheel axle or vehicle loading; bridge deck slabs offer this restraint. It is proposed that the local dilation strains may be added into the phase-2 analysis as a load case using an effective strain approach described in the next section.…”
Section: K =mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, this assessment method can be used when analytical models are insufficient. Situations when analytical models are insufficient are: when no structural plans are available (Aguilar et al, 2015), when there are large uncertainties on the structural capacity as the result of material deterioration or degradation (Lantsoght et al, 2017c), or when the analytical models cannot (fully) consider additional sources of resistance such as transverse load redistribution (Lantsoght et al, 2015) or compressive membrane action (Collings and Sagaseta, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon assessment, the thin deck slabs do not fulfil the code requirements for punching shear. One mechanisms that is not considered in the codes, but that enhances the capacity of these thin decks, is compressive membrane action [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Additionally, the fatigue capacity of the thin decks is subject to discussion, as it is not known if progressive cracking and damage accumulation affects the capacity-enhancing effect of compressive membrane action [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%