2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10462-022-10260-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of artificial intelligence methods for engineering prognostics and health management with implementation guidelines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 232 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aim of PHM is to optimize operational readiness by employing affordable, integrated, and embedded diagnostics and prognostics, embedded training and testing, serialized item management, automatic identification technology (AIT), and iterative technology refreshes [10]. The PHM method has been widely applied in many industries, and many reviews of industrial applications have been published [11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Basics Of Phm Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of PHM is to optimize operational readiness by employing affordable, integrated, and embedded diagnostics and prognostics, embedded training and testing, serialized item management, automatic identification technology (AIT), and iterative technology refreshes [10]. The PHM method has been widely applied in many industries, and many reviews of industrial applications have been published [11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Basics Of Phm Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As technology advances, GBD studies are poised to benefit from emerging trends and technological advancements. Integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning algorithms can streamline data analysis, improve disease modeling, health management and enhance the accuracy of burden estimates [42], [43]. Stakeholders have opined that responsibly and ethically leveraging on AI can help reduce global disease burden and improve population health-outcomes [44]- [46].…”
Section: Emerging Trends and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All proposed definitions are correct, but in the authors' view, the main difference is the range of devices that can be defined. Specifically, one definition states that an AI system can only be created by a human, whereas the other is not limited to human involvement in the creation process (Nguyen et al, 2023). One definition is more general, while the other is narrower, attempting to define the characteristics, functions and types of such systems more precisely.…”
Section: Data Ownershipmentioning
confidence: 99%