2020
DOI: 10.1109/jstsp.2019.2952087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Automated Speech and Language Features for Assessment of Cognitive and Thought Disorders

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
61
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
2
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The review by [ 20 ] is, to our knowledge, the only published work with a comparable aim to the the present review, although there are important scope differences. First of all, the review by Voleti et al.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The review by [ 20 ] is, to our knowledge, the only published work with a comparable aim to the the present review, although there are important scope differences. First of all, the review by Voleti et al.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This section briefly defines key terminology and abbreviations referring and offers a taxonomy of features, adapted from Voleti et al [ 20 ], to enhance the readability of the systematic review tables. This section also briefly describes the most commonly used databases and neuropsychological assessments, with the intention of making these accessible for the reader.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More recently, some studies employ acoustic information extracted from spontaneous speech to detect dementia from preclinical stages of subjective memory loss, to more severe conditions like mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's dementia [40]. Some studies in this area combine natural language processing, looking for lexical/syntactic complexity and semantic coherence, with speech signal processing, analyzing prosody, pause and speech rates, as well as articulation [40]- [42].…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although promising research has been done, the datasets that have been used are often imbalanced and vary across studies, making it difficult to compare the effectiveness of different modalities. Two recent review papers (Voleti et al, 2019 ; de la Fuente Garcia et al, 2020 ) explain that an important future direction for the detection of cognitive impairment is providing a balanced, standardized dataset that will allow researchers to compare the effectiveness of different classification techniques and feature extraction methods. This is what the ADReSS challenge attempted to do.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%