2012
DOI: 10.5539/jsd.v5n12p1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Bayesian Networks as a Participatory Modeling Approach in Support of Sustainable Environmental Management

Abstract: To support sustainable environmental management, uncertain knowledge about complex human-environment-systems from both inside and outside of academia needs to be integrated. Bayesian Network (BN) modeling is a promising method to achieve this, in particular if done in a participatory manner. Based on a review of 30 cases of participatory BN modeling of environmental problem fields, and of three guidelines, we summarize recommendations for BN modeling with stakeholder involvement. In addition, strengths and lim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
25
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem of model parameterization may be particularly challenging for large numbers of system variables (McCann et al., ). The reliability of BBNs is an additional challenge, because quantitative and probabilistic understanding of causal relationships within social–ecological systems is generally poor, regardless of whether it is based on empirical studies or expert knowledge (Duespohl et al., ). Furthermore, use of discrete variables to represent system states and impacts (e.g., low, medium, high) leads to low precision of results and outcomes that are vague and difficult to interpret.…”
Section: Inventory Of Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of model parameterization may be particularly challenging for large numbers of system variables (McCann et al., ). The reliability of BBNs is an additional challenge, because quantitative and probabilistic understanding of causal relationships within social–ecological systems is generally poor, regardless of whether it is based on empirical studies or expert knowledge (Duespohl et al., ). Furthermore, use of discrete variables to represent system states and impacts (e.g., low, medium, high) leads to low precision of results and outcomes that are vague and difficult to interpret.…”
Section: Inventory Of Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the popularity of graphical models (Düspohl, Frank, and Döll, 2012;Greenland and Brumback, 2002) indicates that researchers find it useful to harness visual means to communicate-to peers and endusers-the complexities of the underlying theory. The research questions then emerge from, and are tied to, this theory.…”
Section: Redefining What Quantitative Methods Ismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bayesian Networks can be used in a top-down manner for scenario and impact analysis. Top-down means that it is possible to change the probability laws of one or several parent nodes and analyze how states of nodes situated in lower parts of the network's hierarchy have their state's distribution changed (Düspohl et al 2012). With each of the individual BN, we simulated five scenarios related to biological control and habitat management.…”
Section: Scenario Explorationmentioning
confidence: 99%