A Review of Building Construction Cost Research: Current Status, Gaps and Green Buildings

Abstract

An overall scoping review was conducted to examine research on building construction costs in the past decades. The aim is to provide a better understanding of conventional building construction cost estimation methods, gaps and potential improvement strategies that may mitigate the high risk of the cost overrun in conventional and sustainable building. This study first examined the components included in a building's construction cost and the commonly used calculation methods for cost estimation. Then, additional components included for sustainable buildings were identified and explained. The causal factors for construction cost overruns in sustainable building werediscussed as well. The findings concluded the following: (a) there is no consistent cost definition used in the industry; (b) a variety of cost estimation methods create ambiguity and confusion; and (c) newer cost estimating methods and tools, such as parametric cost estimation, which integrate risk and uncertainties have not been broadly adopted by the building industry. The current practice used to determine a sustainable building's cost estimation is the same traditional method that has been used over several decades, which is based on the material and labor costs. Such a conventional approach does not consider other factors, including the complexity of the sustainable building system, an organization's environment, and the capability of teams, among others. To respond to such a knowledge gap, a comprehensive and consistent cost estimation framework was proposed to integrate risk and uncertainty consideration, which is particularly prevalent in sustainable building.

Not All Green Buildings Are Made Equal: Green Building Construction Cost Premium

“…Because of the variety cost data collection methods and the difference between hypothetical building and actual building cost, we then looked into the uncertainty related to cost estimation methods. In general, across different regions, there are five levels of construction cost estimation associated with completeness of the information and maturity of the design, and different levels of estimation often require different cost estimation methods (Hu & Skibniewski 2021). Level 5 represent highest expected accuracy and level 1 represent lowest expected accuracy.…”

Mitigating Climate Change Impacts in Buildings using Passive Design Strategies: Putting Costs to Contexts

“…Due to the dearth of knowledge about the financial implications of SBD practices, their adoption is low [8]. Therefore, the stakeholders in developing countries are laggard in implementing SBD due to the absence of cost benchmarks to navigate project decisions at the design stages [9,10]. The dearth of the relevant cost benchmarks in SB triggers low adoption and cost uncertainties [11,12].…”