2000
DOI: 10.1680/adcr.2000.12.4.153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of cement–superplasticizer interactions and their models

Abstract: This paper presents a focused review of cement±superplasticizer interactions. It has been concluded from the survey of the literature that cement±superplasticizer interactions are generally preceded by the adsorption of superplasticizers on the hydrating cement particles. However, the mechanisms of such adsorptive interactions have not been adequately addressed experimentally or discussed in the literature. The reason for this appears to be the lack of a conceptual model that can delineate the results to date … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

8
88
0
8

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
8
88
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the mechanical properties of the LD CSH and HD CSH are intrinsic to cement paste (Constantinides and Ulm 2004;Constantinides et al 2003;Zhu et al 2007), the most plausible reason for the lower modulus value of LD CSH for specimen OPC is related to a more porous microstructure of the cement matrix. As afore-mentioned in the "Introduction" section, the PEO-containing polymers influence the properties of fresh cement paste: they can hinder the coagulation and sedimentation of un-hydrated cement particles by increasing the electrostatic and/or steric repulsive forces (Jansen et al 2012;Mollah et al 2000). This effect would influence the distribution of hydration products in the hardened cement paste.…”
Section: Distribution Of Hydration Products In the Presence Of Vesiclesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Because the mechanical properties of the LD CSH and HD CSH are intrinsic to cement paste (Constantinides and Ulm 2004;Constantinides et al 2003;Zhu et al 2007), the most plausible reason for the lower modulus value of LD CSH for specimen OPC is related to a more porous microstructure of the cement matrix. As afore-mentioned in the "Introduction" section, the PEO-containing polymers influence the properties of fresh cement paste: they can hinder the coagulation and sedimentation of un-hydrated cement particles by increasing the electrostatic and/or steric repulsive forces (Jansen et al 2012;Mollah et al 2000). This effect would influence the distribution of hydration products in the hardened cement paste.…”
Section: Distribution Of Hydration Products In the Presence Of Vesiclesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, some reports on retardation of early hydration of cement paste due to admixed PEO-containing polymers (normally used as superplasticizers for cement-based materials) need to be also considered (Sakai et al 2006;Winnefeld et al 2007) as contributing factors. The retardation effects are reported to be mainly relevant to the hydration of C 3 S (Lothenbach et al 2007;Pourchet et al ;Winnefeld et al 2007) and the proposed mechanisms (Gu et al 1994;Jansen et al 2012;Mollah et al 2000) can be summarized as: (1) polymers adsorption on the surface of cement grains, hindering the diffusion of water and Ca 2+ ions at the cement grain/solution interface; (2) impeded growth of hydrate phases due to the presence of polymers; (3) dispersive ability and effect of the polymers which alter the growth kinetics and morphology of the hydration products. These effects are not necessarily [Hu et al 2012a] relevant for the present investigation, mainly because of: 1) the type and size of the hereby PEO-b-PS -based vesicles, being in the nano-range; 2) these self-assembled architectures are in a minimal concentration of 0.025 wt.% per cement weight.…”
Section: Hydration Process Of Cement Paste In the Presence Of Admixedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such admixtures not only improve the in situ placement of concrete, but lower the water demand by up to 40%, improving mechanical and durable properties [6,7]. The mechanisms involved and the superplasticizer compatibility with Portland cement have been studied and described in numerous articles [8][9][10]. These papers report that such admixtures adsorb onto the surface of cement particles, causing inter-particle electrostatic and electrosteric repulsion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%