2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1127(00)00423-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of chemical and physical properties as indicators of forest soil quality: challenges and opportunities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
328
1
49

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 640 publications
(387 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
9
328
1
49
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the large ground contact area of this machine results in high tractive efficiencies, low ground pressures and good stability on steep slopes. The rut depth is often the only criterion that forest managers have to assess soil damage as harvesting occurs (Lacey, Ryan 2000) and is often used in visual assessments of site productivity changes because they indicate changes in infiltration, erosion, water retention and the water-air balance as an early indicator of altered productivity (Schoenholtz et al 2000). Common descriptors include undisturbed and three categories of disturbance: light disturbance, with shallow scarification; moderate disturbance, secondary skid trails or compaction and/or rutting up to 5-8 cm deep; heavy disturbance, primary skid trails, landings, or rutting at least 10-15 cm deep (Grigal 2000).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the large ground contact area of this machine results in high tractive efficiencies, low ground pressures and good stability on steep slopes. The rut depth is often the only criterion that forest managers have to assess soil damage as harvesting occurs (Lacey, Ryan 2000) and is often used in visual assessments of site productivity changes because they indicate changes in infiltration, erosion, water retention and the water-air balance as an early indicator of altered productivity (Schoenholtz et al 2000). Common descriptors include undisturbed and three categories of disturbance: light disturbance, with shallow scarification; moderate disturbance, secondary skid trails or compaction and/or rutting up to 5-8 cm deep; heavy disturbance, primary skid trails, landings, or rutting at least 10-15 cm deep (Grigal 2000).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemical attributes have been correlated with plant yields and thus the variations of a particular indicator are easily interpreted, and allow a quick improvement of the soil chemical properties by liming and/or fertilization. These soil chemical indicators can also be useful in considering the soil's capacity for sustaining forest production and sustainability, maintaining nutrient cycling, plant biomass and organic matter (Schoenholtz et al, 2000). Idowu et al (2008) selected a set of parameters to characterize the soil health among 39 physical, chemical and biological attributes and correlated them with plant growth and yield, in soils under different tillage, rotation and cover cropping, in commercial production fields in New York State, USA.…”
Section: Chemical Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, different microbial groups are differently affected by water restrictions in soil. For example, bacteria have restricted movement in drier soils in which gregate stability are also correlated with hydrological processes like erosion, aeration, runoff, infiltration rate, and water holding capacity (Schoenholtz et al, 2000). In general, a soil is considered physically poor when it shows low rates of water infiltration, enhanced surface runoff, poor cohesion, low aeration and root density, and difficulty for mechanization (Dexter, 2004).…”
Section: Physical Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the natural presence of Pistacia atlantica in these regions insists the appropriateness of the chemical and physical conditions and geomorphological situation. SCHOENHOLTZ et al [2000] emphasized that the natural growth deficiency followed the undesired interaction between plants and the soil physico-chemical properties. Furthermore, based on BINKLEY and GIARDINA 'S [1998] finding similar soil test results, despite the difference in their locations, shows their vulnerability towards the growth of a particular species of tree that is compatible with ecological conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%