2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11920-022-01375-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Childhood Sexual Abuse Perpetration Prevention Programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, children should not bear the responsibility for preventing their own abuse. Thus, to maximize this impact, school-based programs could be implemented in conjunction with other modalities and targets of CSA prevention namely efforts engaging parents (Guastaferro et al, 2022; Mendelson & Letourneau, 2015; Rudolph et al, 2018), those designed for older children (Letourneau et al, 2017; Ruzicka et al, 2021), those focused on perpetration prevention (Assini-Meytin et al, 2020; Stephens et al, 2022), and those that are implemented for adults in the larger community (Assini-Meytin et al, 2021). Coordinated, multi-pronged prevention efforts hold the greatest promise for realizing public health impact and producing a change in rates of CSA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, children should not bear the responsibility for preventing their own abuse. Thus, to maximize this impact, school-based programs could be implemented in conjunction with other modalities and targets of CSA prevention namely efforts engaging parents (Guastaferro et al, 2022; Mendelson & Letourneau, 2015; Rudolph et al, 2018), those designed for older children (Letourneau et al, 2017; Ruzicka et al, 2021), those focused on perpetration prevention (Assini-Meytin et al, 2020; Stephens et al, 2022), and those that are implemented for adults in the larger community (Assini-Meytin et al, 2021). Coordinated, multi-pronged prevention efforts hold the greatest promise for realizing public health impact and producing a change in rates of CSA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%