“…Though plagued with a risky hydraulic framework (Sperry and Tyree, 1990), shorter balsam fir have less distance to transport water therefore avoiding the risk of embolism and moisture stress that larger, mature trees face due to greater xylem tension, a higher exposure to drought conditions, and a greater moisture requirement (Sperry and Tyree, 1990;Tyree and Ewers, 1991;Domec et al, 2008;McDowell and Allen, 2015;Aubin et al, 2018;McGregor et al, 2021;Rollinson et al, 2021). The moisture dependence of balsam fir has been noted in previous studies (D 'Orangeville et al, 2013'Orangeville et al, , 2018aCollier et al, 2022), and may be explained by the growth efficiency trade-off between tracheid embolism resistance and hydraulic conductivity; in non-moisture limiting conditions, a low conductivity may reduce competitiveness (Sperry and Tyree, 1990;Tyree and Ewers, 1991;Domec et al, 2008). Therefore, the generally hydric conditions throughout the range of balsam fir promote a high-risk hydraulic framework, fast growth, and a subsequent moisture dependency, thereby potentially reducing climate resilience and competitiveness in conditions with high hydrological variability.…”