2024
DOI: 10.1186/s12984-023-01294-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of combined functional neuroimaging and motion capture for motor rehabilitation

Emanuel A. Lorenz,
Xiaomeng Su,
Nina Skjæret-Maroni

Abstract: Background Technological advancements in functional neuroimaging and motion capture have led to the development of novel methods that facilitate the diagnosis and rehabilitation of motor deficits. These advancements allow for the synchronous acquisition and analysis of complex signal streams of neurophysiological data (e.g., EEG, fNIRS) and behavioral data (e.g., motion capture). The fusion of those data streams has the potential to provide new insights into cortical mechanisms during movement,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 114 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We recognize that there is broad range of other techniques available to measure brain activity, such as Electroencephalography (EEG), Magnetoencephalography (MEG), Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) or Positron Emission Tomography (PET). Yet, a recent review on motion capture and EEG came to comparable conclusions (94). Also, these techniques have limited spatial resolution and do not allow the exploration of subcortical structures, whose role during finger tapping was unveiled by the multimodal integration of kinematics and brain imaging (83).…”
Section: Current Challenges and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recognize that there is broad range of other techniques available to measure brain activity, such as Electroencephalography (EEG), Magnetoencephalography (MEG), Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) or Positron Emission Tomography (PET). Yet, a recent review on motion capture and EEG came to comparable conclusions (94). Also, these techniques have limited spatial resolution and do not allow the exploration of subcortical structures, whose role during finger tapping was unveiled by the multimodal integration of kinematics and brain imaging (83).…”
Section: Current Challenges and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%