2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2004.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of commonly used analytical and empirical formulae for predicting sound diffracted by a thin screen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
51
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although many different methods and formulae have been proposed for calculating acoustical diffraction [5][6][7][8], those methods that adopt Maekawa's chart [3] and the theory of Kurze and Anderson [4] remain widely used by engineers for outdoor applications, largely because of their simplicity and practicability. Li and Wong [9] provide a comprehensive review of the existing formulae for predicting the performance of a sound barrier in the free field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many different methods and formulae have been proposed for calculating acoustical diffraction [5][6][7][8], those methods that adopt Maekawa's chart [3] and the theory of Kurze and Anderson [4] remain widely used by engineers for outdoor applications, largely because of their simplicity and practicability. Li and Wong [9] provide a comprehensive review of the existing formulae for predicting the performance of a sound barrier in the free field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NASA Aircraft Noise Prediction Program (ANOPP) uses this type of method to estimate shielding effects. Li and Wong [20] provide a review paper that summarizes a number of empirical expressions for barrier theory predictions.…”
Section: Barrier Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tolstoy [2] obtained an exact explicit solution for the sound diffracted by a wedge, represented by a sum of infinite series. For a review of other solution methods, see Maekawa [3], Pierce [4], Hu and Wong [5], Menounou et al [6], Menounou [7], Quis [8], Li and Wong [9], among many others.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%