2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-52229-2_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Conceptions of Secondary Mathematics in Integrated STEM Education: Returning Voice to the Silent M

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, some STEM schools focus on providing strong instruction in each of the separate STEM disciplines, while others focus on STEM integration, merging the disciplines. This lack of consensus extends to the conceptualization or definition of integrated STEM education [6][7][8][9][10][11][12], with researchers also questioning the relative emphasis placed on mathematics and technology compared to science and engineering [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, some STEM schools focus on providing strong instruction in each of the separate STEM disciplines, while others focus on STEM integration, merging the disciplines. This lack of consensus extends to the conceptualization or definition of integrated STEM education [6][7][8][9][10][11][12], with researchers also questioning the relative emphasis placed on mathematics and technology compared to science and engineering [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study examined the presence of mathematics in integrated STEM instruction as well as the levels of cognitive demand required by mathematical tasks which were assigned to students within integrated lessons for physical, earth, and life science units. The examination of these two areas was driven by the notable under-representation of mathematical content within integrated STEM education (English, 2016;Marginson et al, 2013) and, more specifically, the level of mathematical thinking required from students in integrated STEM curricula (Baldinger et al, 2020;English, 2016;Stohlmann, 2018). Moreover, Forde et al Discip Interdscip Sci Educ Res (2023) 5:3 we were drawn to the importance paid to a disciplineintegrated approach in education (Li et al, 2020;Martín-Páez et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas these two studies focused on discipline combination and integrated approaches, there is research that looks more specifically at how mathematical content and practices can be incorporated into discipline integration. For instance, Baldinger et al 's (2020) literature review of 32 published studies from 2013 to 2018 focused on mathematical topics, proficiencies, and practices to determine how mathematics is integrated with other disciplines. Baldinger et al (2020) then noted that currently within discipline integration practices, mathematics serves as a supporting role for science, technology, or engineering learning goals, while the associated conceptual mathematics learning goals are essentially overlooked.…”
Section: Mathematics and Stemintegrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The distribution of discipline learning in STEM approaches has emerged as an issue of concern (e.g., English, 2016aEnglish, , 2016bMaass et al, 2019), with researchers noting the dominance of science and technology in implemented STEM programs (Clark- Wilson & Ahmed, 2009;English, 2016b;Maass et al, 2019;Pang & Good, 2000;Stohlmann, 2018). This in turn has led to consideration of the epistemic character of STEM (Baldinger et al, 2020;Clarke, 2014;Tytler, 2020), representing as it does the convergence of divergent epistemologies, or an "epistemic stew" (Tytler et al, 2019, p. 53).…”
Section: Responses From the Research Community To Stem Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%