A Review of Contemporary Techniques for Measuring Ergonomic Wear Comfort of Protective and Sport Clothing

Abstract

Protective and sport clothing is governed by protection requirements, performance, and comfort of the user. The comfort and impact performance of protective and sport clothing are typically subjectively measured, and this is a multifactorial and dynamic process. The aim of this review paper is to review the contemporary methodologies and approaches for measuring ergonomic wear comfort, including objective and subjective techniques. Special emphasis is given to the discussion of different methods, such as objective techniques, subjective techniques, and a combination of techniques, as well as a new biomechanical approach called modeling of skin. Literature indicates that there are four main techniques to measure wear comfort: subjective evaluation, objective measurements, a combination of subjective and objective techniques, and computer modeling of human–textile interaction. In objective measurement methods, the repeatability of results is excellent, and quantified results are obtained, but in some cases, such quantified results are quite different from the real perception of human comfort. Studies indicate that subjective analysis of comfort is less reliable than objective analysis because human subjects vary among themselves. Therefore, it can be concluded that a combination of objective and subjective measuring techniques could be the valid approach to model the comfort of textile materials.

Textile‐Based Triboelectric Nanogenerators for Smart Wearable Systems: Comfort, Integration, and Application

“…Fit comfort evaluations are divided into subjective evaluations and objective measurement. [ 62 ] The subjective evaluation refers to the satisfaction rating given by the subjects regarding various related comfort characteristics. The evaluation results regarding attributes such as itching and compression can be conveniently revealed, but the results are easily affected by the subject's physical condition and personal wearing habits, and the data cannot be used directly.…”

Material, structure, and design of textile-based compression devices for managing chronic edema

“…foot and lower leg on which it is applied. 176,177 A compression device should accommodate the 3-dimensional shape of the leg. 13 Wearing a compression device that does not fit the patient's leg characteristics may enhance the severity of edema.…”

Development of an ergonomic protective suit for physiotherapists during the COVID-19

“…The recommendations and studies state that PPE (including protective clothing), simultaneously with protective properties, must be appropriate to the wearer's morphology (fit), functional and not affecting wearers work capacities during various routine and work movements -ergonomic. [5][6][7][8] Regarding the ergonomics of PPE, the Regulation (2016/425) of the European Parliament and the Council require that they must be designed and manufactured in such a way that the user can perform the riskrelated activity normally under the intended conditions of use. 9 And some of the general requirements applicable to all PEE include such design principles as ergonomics, highest level of protection possible, suitable constituent materials, maximum permissible user impediment, adaptation of PPE to user morphology, lightness and design strength and compatibility of different classes or types of PPE designed for simultaneous use.…”