2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2019.12.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of Corporate Social Responsibility assessment and reporting techniques in the aviation industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Stevenson and Marintseva (2019), these standards are intentional and they help to build up an allinclusive view for investing and understanding how consumed resources are used; provide CSR appraisal and ranking services; and the choice of which standard to use in evaluating CRS performance is dependent on the internal criteria indices for corporate sustainability assessments, awards and benchmarking solutions that is used by corporations. However, Jankalova (2016) noted that though there is no lack of approaches in CRS appraisal, it is rare to find an approach to measure the state of CSR in each of its components -environmental, social, and economic.…”
Section: Csr and Csr Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Stevenson and Marintseva (2019), these standards are intentional and they help to build up an allinclusive view for investing and understanding how consumed resources are used; provide CSR appraisal and ranking services; and the choice of which standard to use in evaluating CRS performance is dependent on the internal criteria indices for corporate sustainability assessments, awards and benchmarking solutions that is used by corporations. However, Jankalova (2016) noted that though there is no lack of approaches in CRS appraisal, it is rare to find an approach to measure the state of CSR in each of its components -environmental, social, and economic.…”
Section: Csr and Csr Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, directions for the development of methodological tools for assessing corporate social responsibility are considered in work [10]: "Different philosophies, the history of business development, as well as questions of organizational culture give rise to heterogeneous models and, accordingly, different approaches and techniques for assessing corporate social responsibility." In this study, the methods of assessing corporate social responsibility are divided into rating and self-assessment techniques.…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, URSULA's approach tries to promote organizational learning and improvement actions (Koehn and H y Uitto, 2014). As some studies have found, the self-reporting process leads to a better understanding of organizational dynamics (Mohammadi et al, 2020) and better identification of the impact of activities (Donnelly and Wickham, 2021) in pursuit of an organizational contribution aimed at society's holistic development of over a period (Stevenson and Marintseva, 2019).…”
Section: State Of Art Of Usr In Latin Americamentioning
confidence: 99%